Category Archives: Foreign and Enemy Weapons

What we’re getting into in Syria….

A French soldier holds an SA-7 Strela (Grail) tube in Mali.

A French soldier holds an SA-7 Strela (Grail) tube in Mali. Click to enlarge. Image: French Army.

…is about what we got into in Libya. By waiting until the tiny sliver of the opposition that had something in common with American values had been exterminated by the ruthless regime, and until the only functional opposition remaining was hard-core Islamist, we’re going to be sending arms that will be used against Americans and our allies, not only by these groups and all their islamist-warrior pals, but also by moslem terrorists.

The unintended consequences of the foreign policy of dithering-away-any-advantage in Libya are what our allies, the French, are dealing with in Mali, and it’s pretty ugly. Qaddhafi’s tens of thousands of MANPADS are turning up in terrorist hands in the poor, bedraggled, and now war-torn African nation. So far, nos amis have captured a launch tube, a battery, and several copies of an Arabic-language manual covering all the major Russian MANPADS. A story based on AP reporting:

The manual… adds to evidence for the weapon found by French forces during their land assault in Mali earlier this year, including the discovery of the SA-7′s battery pack and launch tube, according to military statements and an aviation official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to comment.

The knowledge that the terrorists have the weapon has already changed the way the French are carrying out their five-month-old offensive in Mali. They are using more fighter jets rather than helicopters to fly above its range of 1.4 miles (2.3 kilometers) from the ground, even though that makes it harder to attack the jihadists. They are also making cargo planes land and take off more steeply to limit how long they are exposed, in line with similar practices in Iraq after an SA-14 hit the wing of a DHL cargo plane in 2003.

Header of Page 313 (start of the SA-7 section) of the captured manual.

Header of Page 313 (start of the SA-7 section) of the captured manual.

The Malian terrorists, “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb” as they style themselves, were training international terrorists to attack aircraft with the SA-7 missile. The elderly SA-7 was ineffective against military aircraft even in the 1980s, and so it’s probable that this training was intended to facilitate terror attacks on civil jetliners.

In Timbuktu, SA-7 training was likely part of the curriculum at the ‘Jihad Academy’ housed in a former police station, said Jean-Paul Rouiller, director of the Geneva Center for Training and Analysis of Terrorism, one of three experts who reviewed the manual for AP. It’s located less than 3 miles (5 kilometers) from the Ministry of Finance’s Budget Division building where the manual was found.

Neighbors say they saw foreign fighters running laps each day, carrying out target practice and inhaling and holding their breath with a pipe-like object on their shoulder. The drill is standard practice for shoulder-held missiles, including the SA-7.

Here’s the manual in question: http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_international/_pdfs/al-qaida-papers-dangerous-weapon.pdf

The manual does note that the weapon has a secondary military use, even if it does not destroy many aircraft. It does change their flight profiles, causing them to fly higher and degrading air support to ground troops.

 

The designs of Fyodor Tokarev

Tokarev TT-33

Typical photo of a TT-33 pistol. Note similarity to the 1911 and other Browning designs, and the absence of thumb or grip safeties.

The Russians, perhaps fortunately for the people who might otherwise still be dominated by Communism, never developed a genius along the lines of John M. Browning. (Kalashnikov, for all the universality of his design, was a one-hit wonder compared to John M., who had paradigm-shifting pistols, sporting and military rifles, shotguns and crew-served weapons in service before he was done). Russia’s versatile designer, their nearest match for Browning, was probably Fyodor Tokarev. Tokarev was working after Browning’s most productive era, and like most gun-aware folks in the middle 20th Century, was aware of Browning’s designs. But he also was able to come up with some original ideas of his own, and in a time — the 1920s and 30s — that the Soviet Union tried to make its name as a beacon of progress, an inventive, well-trained engineer with an interest in self-loading firearms had a guarantee of employment.

The Tula-Tokarev pistol of 1930 and 1933

Tokarev’s first semi-auto design was pretty dreadful: it was a conversion of a Mosin-Nagant, and he was soon back to the drawing board. In the 1920s, he improved the Maxim machine gun and also worked on an auto pistol design. In 1930, the Red Army (as it was still called) adopted his pistol as the Tula Tokarev or TT. It is now called the TT-30 to distinguish it from the later (and much more common) TT-33.

The Tokarev pistol, a short-recoil semiauto, clearly borrows heavily from Browning. The locking system, using a camming lug pinned to the barrel at one end, and retained by the slide stop pin at the other, to pull the barrel down and disengage lugs atop the barrel from the slide, allowing the slide to cycle to the rear. But even here, Tokarev made one great improvement: instead of being restricted to the top of the slide, the Tokarev’s lugs each form an annulus around the barrel. This lets the barrel lugs be made rapidly and cheaply.

That’s not the only advance in the TT. The lockwork was completely unlike any other pistol. For one thing, Tokarev dispensed with a manual safety. For another the feed lips and the lock mechanism including the sear, disconnector and hammer all came out of the pistol all came out of the frame as a single unit for cleaning and maintenance.

Early Tokarev pistols are well-made and, to the surprise of some collectors, any in good condition are well-finished with a deep Prussian blue. While there is a lot of criticism of Russian manufacturing, the fact is that pre-1941 Russian manufacturing could match the nation’s Global rivals for quality. Where the Russians had problems, was manufacturing the vast quantities of small arms required by the enormous Red Army. In the First World War, this embarrassing state of affairs led to Russia having to import weapons from Switzerland, France and United States. Between the wars, Russia industrialized on a massive scale, but the German invasion of June 1941 overran the manufacturing centers of several industrial Soviet republics, and left Soviet industry in disarray.

There were numerous small running changes on the production line during the decades of Tokarev pistol production. One of the most visible was not a specific change, but a general degradation in aesthetics, with rougher machine cuts, less polish, and more manufacturing errors left in the gun, so long as they didn’t affect functioning. In other words, after the disruptions of 1942, the the finish quality of Tokarev pistols declined abruptly, but the pistol remained the simple, reliable weapon it had originally been designed to be. It remained in production for many years after the war, and machinery to produce the pistol was supplied to the entire Communist bloc.

The Tokarev rifle of 1938 and 1940

SVT-40 tokarevIf the Tokarev pistol was a clever adaptation of Browning’s recoil-locked system to the needs of Russian troops, conditions and especially manufacturing, the Tokarev rifle was something else entirely.

The first version adopted was a submission in a competition to replace the troubled AVS-36. Simonov entered an updated AVS, and Tokarev entered the rifle that would be adopted as the SVT-38. After some teething problems of its own, it was updated as the SVT-40.

The SVT used a short-stroke piston design and a tipping bolt. In fact, it is uncannily like the Semi-Automatic FN (SAFN) rifle that John M. Browning’s protegé, Dieudonne Saïve, was developing for FN at the same time, but the SAFN, which would be delayed by the war, was fed by stripper clips. As a rule of thumb, the SAFN was more robust and had a better implementation of the gas system.

The SVT, being chambered for a powerful rimmed cartridge, was one of the earliest uses of a fluted chamber to avoid cartridge adhesion, which was a problem in prototypes. (indeed, even with the flutes it can be a problem with an SVT, especially a rusty one. Be prepared to knock out steel cases with the cleaning rod, after the extractor merrily tears a divot out of the cartridge rim).

The SVT was designed with great attention to ergonomics. It was designed to be light and handy, which it was, despite its length. The stock, barrel and gas system were all places where weight savings was paramount. The receiver was also rather light, but the bolt and bolt carrier are massive hunks of steel; just looking at them makes you think thoughts like Stakhanovite overproduction, Five-Year Plan, and, of course, Chelyabinsk Tractor Works. Think that if you may, but most Tokarevs were made at Tula. (Izhevsk is in the number 2 spot).

It fed from a 10-round box magazine with a latch that would be emulated by the AK, as would be its sights. It had a compensator and ventilated handguards which give it a unique, and somewhat menacing, appearance.  One delightful feature was a small hole at the rear of the receiver, which allows the weapon to be cleaned without risking damage to the muzzle crown.

All SVTs were, originally, grooved for scope mounts, which may make them the first gun in history to have this feature. The scope mount was quite unnaturally high, and allowed use of the iron sights below the scope. Despite the provision for an optic, the SVT never had sniper-level accuracy.

The SVT did not survive the war. Wartime production called for more Mosin-Nagants and cheap subguns, and it took too much time and skill to build, test, and train with the SVT. Some 15,000 were captured and pressed into service in Finland, and others in German service. Today, there are believed to be seven to fifteen thousand Tokarevs on the US civilian market.

Tokarevs Today

The Tokarev pistol and rifle have not been in military service for many years. Pistols survive here and there as second line or personal weapons, but they’re not good choices for self-defense, particularly not the Russian ones with their absent manual safeties. The rifles, amazingly, were carried on the books of the Civil Guard of Finland as late as 1958. At that point, the Finns withdrew the old guns, most of which had been carefully maintained, and sold them to Interarms, which in turn sold them in the United States. If you encounter a Tokarev with the Finnish SA marking, and no import marks, it probably came from this batch.

More recent Tokarev imports include pistols modified to have a thumb safety, and rifles that were arsenal refinished somewhere. The pistols with safeties came from China (pre-1989) and Romania. These late-import guns can be distinguished from the earlier batches by the import marks, and in the case of the rifles, many of them have blued bolts, something they never did back in the USSR.

There are occasional rare variants of both guns: examples being the Tokagypt 58 9mm pistol, and the SVT-40 carbine version.

The ATF from time to time places obstacles in the path of surplus pistol importation, but there are many more Tokarev pistols than rifles in the country than Tokarev rifles. Both Chinese and Russian-made examples were sought-after souvenirs in Korea and Vietnam, and a wartime bringback is the most likely source for an example that is not import-stamped. It was also possible at one time for GIs to bring back personal firearms acquired overseas on an ATF Form 6, but it’s unclear if they ever admitted a Tokarev this way. Nowadays, military judge advocates have done their best to stamp out the concept of war trophies, and they tend to to approve the import of cartridge firearms, so there is a fixed supply of military Toks of both kinds.

Tokarev lived to nearly 100 and was honored on his death with a statue on his grave and a plaque explaining his importance as a gun designer.

This week, we hope to take an in-depth look at a Tokarev pistol and rifle.

A correction: Syrian Snipers have CHINESE .50s

Some time back we posted that the Syrian jihadis had gotten hold of Accuracy International AS50 .50 caliber sniper rifles. We posted several pictures, and sure enough there was a greater variation between various examples of the AS50 than there was between the Syrian weapon and the AS50. Here’s the video again

But we were probably wrong. According to CJ Chivers, best known for his New Journalism style book about the AK-47, the weapon is a Chinese M99. A close comparison of the video from our older post to pictures of the M99 shows that Chivers is correct, at least about those particular rifles in the video. Look at the video (screenshot below), and compare it to the image from the M99 from Max’s world.guns.ru. (World.guns.ru is one of the more authoritative small arms sites out there).

This is the Syrian jihadi shooting the .50.

This is the Syrian jihadi shooting the .50.

This image from World.Guns.RU shows the ChineseM99 from the same angle.

This image from World.Guns.RU shows the ChineseM99 from the same angle. The scope is different, but the gun is the same.

The scope is different, in the two pictures, but the gun is the same. The two bright metal scope mount fasteners are the same on both guns (although some of Chivers’s photos from Syria show round black fasteners on Syrian rebel M99s). Both the M99 and the AS50 have an extensible stock with upper and lower rails and a gap in between. But the daylight between the upper and lower rail on the AS50 is rectangular. On the Chinese M99, the daylight between the upper and lower is irregularly shaped — just like the Syrian jihadi’s gun. The reason for this appears to be that the protrusion from the upper rail is the adjustment lock that must be pressed to slide the stock in or out. See below:

syrian_50_sniper_closeup chinese_m99_closeup_wg_ru

The M99 is an export weapon, used by China in 12.7×108 but exported in both that round, used in the DShK and NSV among other weapons, and 12.7×99 Browning. The weapons in use in Syria are reportedly chambered for the Russian 12.7x108mm round. The rounds are ballistically equivalent.

The gas and bolt systems of the two guns are also different. The Chinese M99 uses a direct impingement system, often used in .50 sniper rifles to reduce weight, and a rotating bolt. The AI weapon uses a short-stroke gas piston and a tipping bolt (like a Tokarev, Simonov or Saïve design). According to World.Guns.ru’s specifications, the Chinese weapon is about 2.1 kilograms (4.6 pounds) lighter than its British counterpart.

Many people still think the People’s Liberation Army of China is still the Korean War vintage levée en masse, poorly equipped, barely trained, and armed with crude hand-me-downs to be thrown away in human-wave attacks. That image wasn’t even true in 1950 (except, perhaps, of former Kuomintang formations that shuffled up the line to death with Communist formations in their rear), and it’s positively not true in 2013. In our experience, Chinese weapons were even before 1990 often the best finished and most trouble-free of the guns made in the Eurasian communist nations. In the decades since, they’ve only gotten better.

Liberator Down Under

Australian Police printed Liberator.

Australian Police printed Liberator. NSW Police via the SMH.

In this case, though, it’s not legal. Unlike the US, where anyone with the tools and skills can legally build a gun for personal use without infringing the law, things bees diffren’ in Oz:

“It is an offence to make, an offence to possess and an offence to use,” [New South Wales state Police Commissioner Andrew Scipone] said.

“Everyone is really concerned this weapon is undetectable. One has been smuggled on the Eurostar train in Europe and there is now a major security review,” he said.

Well, what are you going to do about it? You can’t stop the signal, but it sounds like the Bronze are going to try. One thing they are going to do, is disparage printable guns:

“Make no mistake they will kill at both ends,” Mr Scipione said.

Back to the drawing board? Or at least, to the options menu of the printer.

Back to the drawing board? Or at least, to the options menu of the printer. NSW Police again.

That’s because their test model blew up when fired. As have, to be sure, a number of US-printed guns, although usually the only loss is the barrel and the remainder of the gun still works with a new barrel.

What they may not have noticed, or may have noticed but not wanted to tell the Sydney Morning Herald, is that the international 3DP community is developing things at a rapid rate, rendering objections like this moot. The only people tinkering with this now are early adopters, techies, and fiddlers.

We couldn’t get this video (from which the photos are drawn) to embed, or to run in some browsers, but it’s at this link (and we got it to run in Chrome).

http://www.smh.com.au/action/externalEmbeddedPlayer?id=d-2k5c3

More Finnish Archive Rarities!

Finnish captured AVSes, DPs and 1910sA Simonov AVS-36 was rare everywhere except, it seems, in Finnish captivity. Many of the photos in the Finnish Army photo archive (which is the source of these) include captured AVS rifles, either being used by Finns, or, more often, in piles of captured stuff. That’s what this picture is, and it rewards an embiggening click with a relative close-up of four of the rare AVSes, along with one ringer (a relatively common DP light machine gun). Only one of the AVSes has its 15-round magazine in place, and they all show the bare-metal triggers of the type (the bolt and bolt carrier was also bare metal, same as a Tokarev or, for that matter, a Mosin). The AVS also had a unique flash hider or muzzle brake of a type not seen on any other Russian rifle.

The rare auto rifles are propped in front of an impromptu sculpture of “found objects,” specifically Mosin-Nagants and M1910 Maxim guns. Off to the right, you can see the wheels of a Sokolov mount for another Maxim; in the background, the logistic background of the Winter War, skis and poles. (All that’s missing is an ahkio, a Finnish human-drawn sled, or the shorter Norwegian version, the pulk). The Scandinavian armies rely on ski troops, and on mass-mobilizing reserves. Prior to World War II, they also relied on neutrality, which turned out to be a false hope; now most Scandinavian countries seek allies. It seems to be working. The last two invasions of Scandinavian countries were Russia’s successful but pyrrhic war against Finland, and Nazi Germany’s invasion of Norway and Denmark, which turned into a tar baby for the Germans. (True, there was fighting between the Germans in Norway and the Finns after the latter withdrew from their alliance with Germany in 1944, but that wasn’t really an invasion in the way the others were).

Kaksi ryssien lentokoneesta otettua kk:ta.Our next photo is a pair of pairs of weapons. These DA (Degtyaryev Aviatsiya) machine guns were used as defensive weapons on Russian bomber and liaison planes; that’s why they have the cartridge bags. Stray brass bound up in airplane control cables could lead to a bad day. It’s the same basic machine gun as the DP used in rifle units and the DT used in armored vehicles; the aviation and tank versions usually used a double-depth pan magazine instead of the slim 47-rounder of the ground forces’ version.

Once again, click on the picture to see it at full size, or go to the Finns’ excellent archive yourself. Many of the SA-Tuva archive are bleached, or desaturated like this second picture, or flecked with dust like the first one. That doesn’t really matter; the original photos were generally professionally composed and shot with quality equipment onto glass negatives, we think, or at least with view cameras (like a Speed Graphic). So they are clear enough; these aren’t soldiers’ snapshots, but professional photogs’ work. They also are a priceless historical archive, bringing to us today primary documentation about a war that is now all but a legend.

We have still not examined all of the archival photos, but they do seem to be primarily ground forces’ photos. The Finnish air forces had a similar qualitative superiority to the vastly more numerous Russians, and the quality seems to have come entirely from personnel. The Finns had a variety of foreign-built, hand-me-down equipment, some of which (Gladiator, Buffalo) had horrible records in their native air arms.

Liberator-tje – Neutered Netherlands Liberator

Netherlands-capgun-Liberator-tjeThe Dutchman behind this project, Dave Borghuis, wants us to know he’s not a wacko bird like those “scary and crazy” US-ians.

I am not a gun nut, i find it scary things and crazy how the USA handle the gun laws.
Check your own local laws BEFORE printing any part of the Liberator-tje.

Just to make it clear that he’s an enlightened European from a nation that stood against the Nazi menace for over half a week (four days from invasion to capitulation in May 1940, followed instantly by more collaboration than resistance), he makes it clear that his Liberator is an enlightened, European, non-combatant Liberator.

In the Netherlands any gun is strictly forbidden unless you have a licence. To prevent any problems with dutch law I (zeno4ever/Dave Borghuis) modified the files so its impossible to shoot any bullet with the printed gun. I checked this with someone that has some insight in Dutch law regarding gun laws and the modifications I made should make it legal to print the gun in Netherlands. Be sure to check your own local laws if you want to print this Liberator-tje.

via Liberator-tje – TkkrLab.

Netherlands-capgun-Liberator-on-printerIn fact, his version is a cap gun. (That’s what the little ring in the top photo is — toy-gun caps, Euro style). But we’re probably being too hard on Dave. As he says elsewhere, he’s not interested in guns, he’s interested in printing 3D objects, and so he should be welcomed as another part and branch of the revolution. He did, indeed, print a locally adapted Liberator, even if it is a gelding, and he promises to make his revised (spayed and neutered) files available to the public, probably on his blog given the fact that the State Department has sent its Panzers to occupy DefCad for the time being. (Interesting if nonpertinent factoid: SecState John F. Kerry is, like the last Panzer-emitter, of Austrian descent).

After all, the Dutch may not have materially slowed the entire German war machine down, but one individual Dutchman fired a shot that took German paratroop general Kurt Student off the board for some very critical months of the war. A small nation in a tough continent has to live within the bounds of possibility.

Dave is also the first one we know of to have printed the Liberator on his particular machine, the common (well, to the extent any 3DP is common) RepRap Prusa i3. True, his is a cap gun, but it’s — you’ve been hearing these words from us a lot — a proof of concept.

Dave also made (we think; please correct us if we’re mistaken) this excellent animation of Liberator assembly. So we’re grateful for that, even if he thinks we’re “roondweg idioot” over here, which you can probably figure out even if you can’t grok Nederlands.

We’re also grateful to Dave for pointing us to this classically hand-wringing article by Cory Doctorow in the Grauniad. Doctorow argues that because Guns are Bad we need to find a way to ban 3D printing of them without, you know, banning 3D printing. It’s typical Doctorow, a tech lover losing out to his inner fascist, and as good an explanation as any as to why we haven’t been back to his site in about four years.

In the home-manufacture revolution, it’s From Each According to his Ability, and To Each According   to his Liberties.

Are you Finnish with Russian weapons?

If you’re not, the guys in these pictures are. The pictures are courtesy of SA-Kuva, which is Finnish for Finnish Army Photo — the army archives there have just released a large quantity of wartime photos. (If you have a Russian-spec Mosin or other ex-Russian bangstick with the stamp “SA” in a rectangle, you have an artifact of a Finnish tactical victory over their would-be slavemasters from the USSR). The captions are, alas, in Finnish, a language little spoken this side of the Gulf of Bothnia.

These pictures are reprinted here with permission. Don’t forget that you can click to enlarge them even further. First up we have MG gunners training(?) with what looks like some kind of training rig. The Finnish caption is: “IT-tykki lossin luona. Vuosalmi. 1939.12.18.” OK, so our translation is: AA-gun alongside cable, at Vuosalmi (a town on the coast), 18 Dec 39. Note for general use that an IT-tykki is an AA gun, and a TT-tykki is an AT gun.

IT-tykki lossin luona.

Here’s another picture, this one showing a Russian BT-5 tank that has fallen into the clutches of the Finns. Can’t make heads nor tails of the caption, though: “Hovista 0,5 km etelään kenttäkanuunan yhdellä laukauksella suoralla suuntauksella tuhottu hyökkäysvaunu. Syskyjärvi 1940.01.10.” Out of that, we get the date (10 Jan 40), the place Syskyjärvi, and a reference to 0.5 kilometers. It may be in the caption, but in English we can’t tell whether the tank was knocked out, or just abandoned by bugging-out Russians.

BT-5 Tank come a cropper in Finland

And next up, we have two truly classic weapons: the Russian knock-off of the Krupp anti-tank gun, here in 45mm, and the Finnish soldier standing over it armed with an ex-Russian semiauto rifle. Original caption: “Ryssiltä vallattu hv-tykki etulinjassa suomalaisten käytössä. Kollaanjoki. 1940.01.01.”

Ryssiltä vallattu hv-tykki etulinjassa suomalaisten käytössä.

The rifle is a very rare one, a Simonov AVS-36. It was a select-fire rifle chambered for the 7.62 x 54R cartridge, and fed from a 15-round magazine. Soon after its adoption, it was supplanted by the Tokarev SVT-38 and -40 rifles, which were made in both semiauto (SVT) and select fire (AVT) versions. Tokarev rifles are noteworthy when encountered, but compared to AVS-36s they are as commonplace as Mausers. Interesting note about these Russian interwar rifles — when you do find one that is not a post-’68 import, it will probably have an SA stamp, as Finland sold off their stocks before the GCA of 1968 required imported milsurps to be marked with the importer’s name and city. They are, at least the semiauto Tokarevs are, a rare GI bringback, as they were used occasionally as captured weapons by the Germans, and occasionally by ragtag Chinese formations in the first year of the Korean War.

The Russian units that hit Finland, and got creamed, are widely reported, based on contemporary Soviet propaganda, to have been second-string units. But their heavy armament with state-of-the-Red-art semi-auto rifles — most of which wound up in Finnish custody, as did the surviving Ivans — argues to the contrary. These were first-line units with first-line equipment. What benefited the Finns was the recently concluded military purges, which eliminated almost everyone in the Red Army at the rank of Colonel or higher — and intimidated the living Lenin out of the survivors. The new, high-tech arms pushed into surface by the brilliant Tukhachevskiy before his murder were too much for an army purged of its best and brightest to maintain, and the Russians reverted to WWI weapons, supplemented by hastily adopted submachine guns. (Which had been part of Tukhachevskiy’s reforms, but were simple enough for a dumbed-down service to grasp).

The Finns fought not one, but two wars against the Russians (1930-40 and 1942-44), and they beat the Russians in battle after battle. Man for man, they were by far the better army, but in Stalin’s pungent phrase, “quantity has a quality all its own.” In both wars, the Finns were overwhelmed and agreed to humiliating concessions.

But the Russians didn’t get what they wanted — a return of Finland to Russian suzerainty, as it had been prior to the collapse of the Empire.

Hat tip: Alan Taylor’s In Focus blog at The Atlantic.

Terrorist might do 2 years for 4 bomb murders

One John Anthony Downey is under arrest as British prosecutors seek to close a 1982 mass murder by IRA terrorists. In July, 1982, they charge, he set and detonated a massive car bomb that destroyed an element of one of the units that guards Buckingham Palace. The bomb, one of two coordinated bombs set by the IRA in London’s Hyde and Regent Parks that day, killed seven horses and three men, two of them just married; a fourth member of the Blues and Royals died of his wounds four days later. Many other men and at least one horse suffered serious wounds.

John Downey, from County Donegal in the Republic of Ireland, is accused of being responsible for the car bomb that targeted a troop of the Royal Household Cavalry, Blues and Royals, as they rode from their barracks to Buckingham Palace.

Mr Downey is charged with the murders of Squadron Quartermaster Corporal Roy Bright, 36, Lieutenant Anthony Daly, 23, Trooper Simon Tipper, 19, and Lance Corporal Jeffrey Young, 19, on July 20 1982.

Sue Hemming, the Crown Prosecution Service’s head of special crime and counter-terrorism, said: “The Metropolitan Police Service has been investigating the explosion near Hyde Park in London which occurred on July 20 1982.

“It is alleged that Downey is responsible for the improvised explosive device contained in a car parked in South Carriage Drive, London, which resulted in the deaths of four members of the Royal Household Cavalry, Blues and Royals, as they travelled on their daily route from their barracks to Buckingham Palace.”

via Man, 61, charged with murdering four soldiers in IRA’s 1982 Hyde Park bombing – Telegraph.

But thanks to an agreement the British Government and the terrorists reached in 1998, Downey need not be acquitted to get out of jail soon. If Downey is convicted, he can apply for a transfer to a prison in Northern Ireland (rather than one in England, where most of London’s murderers end up). Then he can apply for release after two years, regardless of his nominal sentence.

Meanwhile, of course, Downey’s victims are still dead, and their family members are still bereaved. Not that any of the IRA goons (or the Protestant terrorist goons, who were as bad and arguably worse) gives a damn about them. 

The British were handling terrorism better when they were just having the SAS show up and blow these creeps away. Go easy on terrorism, and what do you get? Most everybody has seen the news from Woolwich. That’s what you get.  It’s almost as if the nation had a suicide pact with its political elite.

New Pentagon Report on China

Chinese HordesEvery year since 2000, the Pentagon has been directed to make a report on the military of the People’s Republic of China. The most recent iteration was just published (.pdf) last week.

Some interesting things are happening in China. One of the principal things is that personnel costs are rising as a share of the Chinese defense budget, and now comprise more than half the budget.

There are politicians who would like to zero out defense spending and throw the “peace dividend” into the eternally expanding, immune-to-satiety pieholes of the handout-seekers. That’s pretty much where the post-Cold War “peace dividend” went, and neither peace nor dividends resulted. As investments go, “investment” in US government programs is a mug’s game, returning fractional pennies on the squandered dollar.

A lot of pundits argue that China’s defense spending is so much lower than ours that they can never catch up. They’re not figuring on the fact that China buys its military hardware in the same discount market that Walmart uses: China.

Why the Chinese andUS defense budgets aren’t comparable,

Or, why China gets more for a dollar.

china propaganda gun 02At first glance the Chinese $119B budget seems like it can’t possibly compete with America’s $538B. We’re outspending them over four to one! But the budgets aren’t really comparable.

  1. The US defense budget is larded with non-defense spending, pork, because of the corruption of Congress. 
  2. The US personnel are paid US wages.
  3. China has a draft military, and can fill low-skill enlisted jobs with low-cost national servicemen.
  4. The US personnel costs include an immense and expensive retired cohort, and exploding health-care costs for family members and retirees.
  5. US procurement laws and regulations are complicated and arcane, creating work for legions of lawyers, consultants, fixers and middlemen, roughly quadrupling the cost of DOD items versus free-market purchases.

The Chinese are closing the quality gap, and of course the numerical inequalities have always favored them. Anyway, the .pdf is there. Go read about China, and make your own decisions about whether — and how much — to worry.

Ivan’s .50 sniper rifle: the OSV-96

The OSV-96 is a Russian heavy sniper rifle with some unique features.

The OSV-96 is a Russian heavy sniper rifle with some unique features.

The Russian Army has always gone its own way, whether it was Tsar Nicholas’s guys adopting the Mosin and a wheeled carriage for the Maxim, or the Red Army’s flowering of innovation under Tukhachevskiy, which gave the Russian nation tank doctrine, world-leading paratroop operational art, and modern weapons like the ill-fated Tokarev SVT.

They’ve also proven adaptable, and willing to adopt a foreign idea when it’s adaptable to the benefit of the rodina. The classic example is the assault rifle, a German concept refined and improved to yield the AK-47 and its many progeny. But you can also add the more recent adoption of the 9mm Parabellum pistol caliber, a German round that gradually took over much of the world, and à propos this post, the .50 caliber sniper rifle. Russians are no novice operators of large-caliber rifles: they deployed 14.5mm weapons early in WWII as anti-tank rifles. But the .50 sniper is an American concept, begun on the battlefields of Vietnam with scoped machine guns, and evolved into a long-range precision system largely as a private venture by Ronnie Barrett.

The OSV-96 is one of Russia’s entries in the .50 sniper stakes, and it has some unique features. This may be the heavy sniper rifle being used in the Syrian video we posted previously.

OSV-96 folding. Click to enlarge. From Max Popenker's world.guns.ru.

OSV-96 half folded, showing the locking lugs and folding mechanism. Note the Russian take on an optic-mounting rail. Click to enlarge. From Max Popenker’s world.guns.ru.

Perhaps most interesting and unique is the weapon’s ability to fold back on itself for transport. That reduces the length of the weapon from about 1.75 meters (roughly 69″, 5’9″)  to 1.15 (45″, 3’9″, about 6″ longer than an M16A1), which, as the video shows, allows the rifle to be carried in urban fighting or in the back of a BMP combat vehicle. The folded length of 1154 mm is remarkable, given that the barrel is 1000 mm (39″) by itself. This is only possible because the fold of the weapon comes right at the end of the chamber. The analogous weapon that readers of this page are most likely to be familiar with is the Barrett, which with the standard 29″ barrel is 57″ long, and can only be shortened for transport by being disassembled (the upper and lower receivers can be detached by releasing two pins, much like an AR-15). The advantage, then, goes to the Russian design by a nose (you can see the simple folding process in the movie).

OSV-96 12.7mm sniper rifle — specifications
Type of Cartridge 12.7 x 107mm sniper cartridge, 12.7 cartridge for large-caliber machine guns
Firing regime semi-automatic
Accurate firing range to 1700m
Magazine capacity 5
Mass without optic 12.9 kg
Dimensions folded 1154mm x 132mm x 196mm
Length, combat-ready 1746mm
Source of information: the OSV’s Manufacturer, KBP Tula

Like most large-caliber rifles, the OSV-96 produces recoil forces that would be at the ragged edge of human tolerance without technologies to manage the recoil. One is the standard, near universal one on this class of weapon: a muzzle brake that vents gases back, counteracting recoil force with an unpleasant magnification of muzzle blast for the operator and anyone nearby. Some sources claim that the barrel being free-floated and attached only to the receiver at all times and to the bolt only when in battery also reduces recoil; this does not seem logical to us (a free-floating barrel has accuracy, not recoil-reduction benefits.

The weapon appears from photographs to have a multi-lug, interrupted-thread bolt, reminiscent of the breechblock of many heavy artillery pieces. The gas operation appears to be similar to that of the SKS or the pre-WWII Simonov and Tokarev rifles (or, for that matter, to the FN 49 and FAL). The gas piston drives a pushrod which in turn drives a bolt carrier to the rear. All those rifles, however, operate with a Browning-style tipping bolt, and the OSV’s bolt rotates to lock and unlock.

There are not many .50 sniper rifles chambered for the Russian 12.7 x 108mm round, rather than the generally comparable NATO/Browning 12.7 x 99.

Apart from these features, it’s fairly standard stuff: gas operated, rotating bolt, usually fired prone from the bipod, 5-round detachable magazine, accepts day or night optics. The gun’ weight is 12.9 kg (28.4 lb). That’s only slightly better than the recoil-operated Barrett at 14 kg (30.9). There is a shorter-barreled (20″) Barrett on the market for private sales, but what it gains in tractability it loses in effect, with lower velocity. The Barretts we used in the US military were all long-barrelled, or perhaps we should say, the Barretts we had, because we never really did find a good time to employ them. They were fun to play with, but they were never quite the answer for the tactical questions we faced. The latest USGI Barrett is the M107A1, which cuts the gun’s weight to about 26 lb. by several engineering improvements, notably the substitution of a lot of titanium alloys for steel. As a bonus, some of the Ti-alloy structures are stronger and endure high temperatures better than steel, but the material is a bear to machine, making titanium structures expensive and time-consuming (ergo, even more expensive) to produce. This may explain why the OSVs observed to date are innocent of any titanium parts, even though Russia has vast deposits of titanium ores.

The video makes a modest and probably realistic claim of accuracy to 1,700 meters for the OSV-96; that same claim is repeated in other official KBP materials. The Russians reportedly manufacture special precision ammunition, their equivalent of Western “special ball,” “match”, and other high-precision ammo like the Raufoss Mk 211. The OSV can also fire ordinary 12.7 machine gun ammunition as used in the DShK and NPV without ill effect on the gun, but at the price of degraded accuracy. (The tracers seen plinking man-sized targets at 700m in the video are probably MG ammo).

As a bonus, at the end of the video, a video for another Tula product plays. It’s the GSh-18 pistol, a weapon at least as unusual as the OSV; in fact, we found the OSV video by following up on a posting on the GSh-18 at Forgotten Weapons that included this video.

More OSV-96 information is available at Max Popenker’s World.Guns.RU site. There’s an excellent photographic walk-around by Yuri Pasholok that’s worth many thousands of words, too.