Category Archives: Pistols and Revolvers

NYPD marksmanship improving

NYPDIn the town that really could use Superman to fight its crime, if only he was real, comes a tale of simple mortals — NYPD plainclothes officers — confronted on the street by what appears to have been a young gangbanger, 16-year-old Kimani Gray. They fired 11 shots when Gray produced a handgun.

Good news: they didn’t hit any bystanders, this time.

Better news: 7 of the 11 shots hit Gray, sparing him a trip to Riker’s Island and sending him express to Hades instead. The WSJ blogs:

Authorities have said two plainclothes police officers fired 11 shots at Gray after he allegedly pointed a revolver at them. Family and friends of the teenager have disputed that he had a gun.

Police said the shooting unfolded after Gray was behaving suspiciously and fiddling with his waistband, suggesting to the officers that he was concealing a weapon. After the plainclothes officers identified themselves, police allege that Gray pulled out a revolver and aimed it in the direction of the officers.

Investigators determined Gray was struck once in the back of his left shoulder, once in back of each thigh, twice in the front right thigh, once in the left rib cage and once in the left forearm. A spokeswoman for the city’s chief medical examiner said the coroner was still investigating which of the bullets killed the teenager.

via Brooklyn Teen Hit by Seven Police Bullets – Metropolis – WSJ.

That bullet sequence sounds to me like the first shots were the ones that struck Gray’s thigh, turning him to the right, and the left side and back wounds went into him as he spun around and fell. The fatal hit was probably the left rib or the left shoulder hit.

Assuming the report is correct, and Gray had a gun (or something that resembled a gun), this is a good shoot. It would have been better without the four stray rounds off in the city air, but it’s a lot better than the display in Midtown a while ago.

Of course the kid’s friends and family say he didn’t have a gun. Repeat after me: it was not in his character. He wasn’t like that. He had made a few mistakes, but he was turning his life around. He was an aspiring (rap star, basketball player, anything but someone who worked for a living like other New Yorkers). But the family couldn’t find a picture for the paper except one with the kid’s hat turned around and him trying to look all grown up and tough.

Pulling a gun on armed men is an IQ test. Gray just failed.

It’s not concealed if you can see it

christiedawnharrisSee, this is what happens when you carry concealed without getting proper instruction:

MARCH 6–An Oklahoma woman arrested Monday on drug charges had a loaded handgun hidden in her vagina, according to police.

The weapon was discovered during a search of Christie Dawn Harris, 28, by a female officer with the Ada Police Department. According to a police report, the cop spotted the handle of the five-shot revolver “sticking out from” inside Harris, who is seen at right.

via Cops: Perp Had Loaded Revolver In Her Vagina | The Smoking Gun.

It might be that she’s not smiling because getting arrested is no fun, but it’s probably because she has no teeth: along with the gun in her, er, you know, they also found copious quantities of glassine baggies of meth in her rectum. If you’ve known any meth users, their dentition makes the worst Briton look like a TV anchor.

ImageAt least the weapon, seen here on the left, wasn’t a Model 29. It was a tiny North American Arms revolver, the kind that was once available as a belt-buckle ornament (we’re hazy on what happened to that but we think the ATF ruled it an NFA-regulated Any Other Weapon).

We’re told that Harris had three rounds and two empty cases in the five-shot single-action .22. No word on whether she shot somebody with the two fired rounds!

The police report is at the link. The Smoking Gun, which reports a lot of Lord Love a Duck type stories from police blotters, has seen similar behavior before. (A male, what looks like a S&W Model 10 with a 5-inch barrel (!), and a rectum that was apparently no stranger to prison). In these cases, they might rename the site The Stinking Gun….

WeaponsMan Glocks Up, Part 2 of…?

Glock17-G3We recently described part one of “Glocking up,” in which we started mechanical training and did a range fire with a slightly adjusted G17 Gen 3. We were back at the range yesterday, working strictly on trigger issues in line with the coaching we got from a great instructor.

Results were frustrating… so-so. We were unable to replenish our stack of ball ammo for this session (no one local had it, and we wanted to go today, not wait) so we fired a single box of 147 grain JHP warshots. At least at 7 meters, they print to the same place as the ball ammo — to the extent that the shooter does his part.

If you recall, our mods were: Vickers extended safety and slide stop, and some non-slip applique on the slick sides of the G17 (the one illustrated above is stock, a file photo). Jeff Zimba, well known for his Bigshooterist YouTube channel and his writing in Small Arms Review, is also a Glock convert, and has opted for quite different options: an adjustable trigger, a rubber slip-over grip, a threaded barrel, one of two suppressors, and a shoulder stock (which, legally, requires registering the Glock as an SBR (short-barreled rifle) under the National Firearms Act).  Here’s Jeff’s Glock video (note, when we looked at it, it had an annoying shifty-gold-dealer ad).

Jeff’s reference to the Glock as “Tupperware,” which might be a standard dig but we haven’t heard it before. And we still are having a very hard time with the gun’s utilitarian industrial design. We like guns with history and class and style.  A CZ has style. A Beretta has style. Walther P-38? Old school, but full of style. A Glock? Boring, dull, as stolid as an Austrian bureaucrat, and about half as interesting. If the Beretta is a Maserati (complete with the ability to occasionally produce grinding noises and metal chips from its innards) and the Walther an old Mercedes 380SL, the Glock’s a freaking minivan.

But sometimes, a minivan is what you need. We’ll be continuing to practice with the Glock until we either carry the thing daily, or retire it to the safe as a representative of an era we were not ready to join wholeheartedly. But we want to give it a fair chance. And that means more practice, dry and live fire.

Hat tip for Jeff’s video: The Gun Wire, which always has an interesting and broad selection of videos every day along with their daily gun headlines.

WeaponsMan Glocks Up

Glock17-G3Glocks. Love ‘em or hate ‘em, right? Not really, here. We just didn’t like ‘em, much. Had tried them on and off over the years (a lot of the SOF world has been slouching towards Glock for years, and SF has them now; even the Guard SF has a partial issue of ‘em). And we could take them or leave them. We had a perfectly good carry gun (CZ-75) and could work the issue gun alright (Beretta M9) and were strong believers in good training and a meh gun, beating meh training and the very best gun every time.

So for a long time we resisted the undertow that is sucking everyone down into the Glock vortex, but now we’re feeling the tug ourselves.

What we didn’t like was:

  • It’s not a DA so you can’t make a second strike on a bad primer.
  • Absence of a manual safety. This is beloved by those police departments that cap officer-candidate IQ at 100, so that they don’t face the hopeless task of teaching some cadet whose IQ is too low to get executed how to take a safety on and off. We like the safety, not for regular carry, but for when you have to interrupt pistol firing to do something else.
  • Its trigger is not like anything else out there, except all the Glock-offs that copied it. They didn’t copy it because it’s a really good trigger, but because LE contracts demand something like it. It’s actually a spongy, creepy trigger with a weird reset that inspires people to throw their fingers off after firing.
  • And the trigger only resets when the slide cycles. That means the weapon is awkward for dry fire drills, an essential component of improved shooting for anybody. (One answer may be the SIRT training pistol).
  • It is famous for the tsunami of Law Enforcement Officer NDs it unleashed. Since its military popularity got started, it’s also been there, with a sheepish look on, for a pretty good handful of SF/SOF NDs. (Aside: an ND not a firing offense anywhere we know of except Tier 1 SOF, and some private companies. It should be — this is one of the few true real-world applications for Zero Tolerance). Always these surprise KaBANG!os trace back to human error, but the design of the gun is a human-error enabler. Most weapons don’t have to be dry-fired to begin disassembly. (Again, you really begin disassembly with a clearance drill, so this should never be an issue. A bunch of shot feet, butts, buddies and police-station time clocks beg to differ).
  • In larger calibers, especially .45, it doesn’t support the case head adequately. This design failure is the principal cause of the famous Glock kB! that has launched a thousand discussion threads. This is not a big factor for us, as we’re bullet-placement guys and we place 9mm better than stuff that recoils harder. (Maybe you do, too).
  • It’s not steel. We like steel. It’s no good for pistol-whipping people.
  • It’s a bit industrial and soulless. Guns have character and show that they were designed by real people. Not sure how Gaston Glock pulled this off, but his famously clean-sheet design (he was a maker of implements like knives and shovels, and knew nothing about guns when he started) has about as much character as a lawn sprinkler, or one of his (or anybody else’s) snow shovels.
  • The factory sights stink. There are remedies for this, so it’s well down the list.
  • The plastic grip can be pretty slick. Remedies for this, too.
  • Until the Gen 4, it either fit you or it didn’t. (Now the oft-copied Glock has copied a feature back, replaceable backstraps). This has generated a cottage industry of Glock modifiers who angle, shape, stipple, and otherwise torture a Glock into working for you. One very popular mod is to lose the finger bumps on the front strap.
  • Some of the controls assume you have an alien (or Austrian, perhaps) hand size and shape.There are remedies for this, too.

But we’ve watched, and the guys who break down into “1911 guys” and “Glock guys” showed an interesting dynamic: the transitions all went one way, from the big old Browning design to the soulless appliance. At the same time, people and agencies that seemed happy with Berettas and SIGs were suddenly flirting with, if not changing over, to Glocks. Sure, Glocks have some issues. But the trendlines all ran one way. The other guns growing in market share, particularly in the duty gun world, were the Glock-offs. (H&K’s product isn’t a Glock tribute, but their pistol market share is nominal).

So we were willing to try a Glock out, and with the help of an expert got one set up the right way. We liked it a lot, actually, and here’s the results of the trial:

  • It will probably be replacing the CZ as normal-clothing carry gun. The CZ-75 is a great gun, but it’s a historical piece now and probably deserves to be retired. It bears the scars of 25 years of worldwide service and it’s been 100% trustworthy. It will be a hard act to follow.
  • Jeez, the Glock 17 is really simple. The CZ’s got a simple Browning cam lock system, a model of functional minimalism, but the Glock one-ups that by dispensing with locking lugs and recesses and using the ejection port as the locking recess.
  • We didn’t wring it out hard, but it digested both NATO FMJ and defensive JHP with ease.
  • It hits right where it’s aimed if the shooter does his bit.
  • It’s ridiculously easy to clean and maintain.
  • The G17 (Gen 3) provides more firepower in a more compact package than the CZ or M9.
  • Accuracy needs work (on the shooter side). As mentioned, the trigger is very, very different, and when coached to manage the trigger reset, groups tightened. Practice is key, practice, practice, practice. (This does not constitute a threat to bring a Glock to Carnegie Hall, however).
  • It’s invisible, for all intents and purpose. Bring a CZ-75 to a range, people want to talk to you. And try it out. Bring a Glock and they yawn.
  • Even an empty magazine drops like a rock — like it’s supposed to.
  • The right mods make what’s clearly a good, reliable gun more ergonomic and therefore better.

It will be interesting to see if Glock infatuation lasts, or if the good old reliable CZ exerts its magnetism again.

Specific mods

Here are the mods to the gun at present, and probably for good.

  • Some non-slip appliqué on the grips.
  • Vickers extended magazine release. Look at your thumb. Now look at the thumb in one of those pictures in advertising that uses a perfect hand model. The shorter Thumb A is compared to Thumb B, the more you need this.
  • Vickers extended slide stop. Same message applies, although you can drill to work the slide stop with right or left hand and find some work-arounds for the stock slide stop.
  • Tritium sights, specifically Trijicon HD model GL101O. We’ve come to regard these as an absolute necessity on a combat pistol, regardless of make.  When you need a gun, you usually need it in the dark. The glow in these sights lasts several years, and then they must be replaced. The sights degrade gradually as the radioluminescent isotope decays.

So that’s Part 1 of WeaponsMan Glocks Up. To be continued…

Six reasons “practical” competition isn’t

USMC sight picture illustrationThe various pistol, rifle, and multi-gun competitions are often billed as good training for self-defense and even for police and military operations, but they aren’t for a number of reasons:

Too much emphasis on the quick draw

Perhaps the generations of Hollywood westerns that dominated the American cultural mindscape from circa 1950 to 1970 are to blame: the vast majority of the founders and rulemakers of these sports are Baby Boomers, whose cultural formation took place in the Cowboys and Indians period.

The quickest draw, of course, is the one where the gun is already in your hand, and people know this even if event organizers don’t. In an actual defensive situation, it may well be more important to draw the gun with stealth than with speed. But “practical” shooting goes for quick-draw flash every time.

This complaint could actually be more generalized: these sports overemphasize speed in general, leading to risk-taking in the interests of speed. This is an incentive badly aligned with the needs of military and police forces. The quick draw and the snap shot are advanced skills to be pursued only when aimed deliberate fire is not possible.

Not enough emphasis on good judgment

When there are lasting consequences from a shooting in the military or police, it’s seldom because the shooter wasn’t quick enough. It’s almost always because the shooter could have exercised better judgment. Speed pressure is, of course, corrosive of judgment. When to shoot is almost always a decision of subordinate importance to whether to shoot. Exercises that test that judgment don’t fit into the speed/accuracy/penalty scoring paradigm of most events.

For decades, aviation safety experts pursued better pilot skills, but in the last 20 years of wo they’ve fully internalized the idea that most mishap involve, in some way, a pilot of perfectly adequate stick and rudder skills being tested in his judgment and found wanting. This has led to an air safety revolution, as the training and evaluation base has added judgment analytics, scenario-based-training, desicision-making exercises and counteraction of hazardous attitudes to its toolbox. Combat weaponscraft is ready for a similar revolution.

Almost every tragic combat shooting story we cover here is a tale of judgment. Why isn’t this part of practical shooting events?

Optimizing vs Satisficing

Those are two approaches economists and decision-theory wonks see as alternative decision modes.  Optimizing is well understood. It is done by evaluating the possibilities and getting the absolute optimum one. Satisficing is a much less frequently encountered word, even though it’s a much more commonly used decision strategy — one that recognizes that time spent optimizing is itself a steep opportunity cost.

Satisficing means, essentially, setting a bar (threshold) and accepting any outcome that crosses that bar. Real gunfights are like that: if you’re alive, your opponent(s) dead, and no friendly fire or collateral damge has taken place, that’s a win. So in the real world every disabling shot into a human target has equal value: there is no x-ring. In the competitions, there’s great weight on very minute variations in speed and accuracy. It’s probably impossible to design a “practical” competition that’s weighted the way combat is.

Encouraging gimmicky weapons and holsters

Screen shot 2013-02-25 at 9.55.21 PMHow practical are these rigs, really? In some events you see 6″ barreled 1911s with trigger jobs that are not safe off the range and mounted optics, dangling in gimmicky mid-thigh holsters. Carry that for a week and let us know how it’s working for you.

Adding a real field-oriented test or two to the stages might bring some reality back. Like thrust the gun in a 55-gallon drum of mud before a stage. How you like your red dot now?

Unimaginative targets

ipsctargReal enemies don’t stand still, and don’t make straight line, linear moves as if they’re on rails. Most of the targets presented in competition do one or the other of these.

The scoring rings on the IPSC target, also, are somewhat unrealistic. But there’s no really realistic way to render the way that the human organism absorbs shots — because there’s so much individual variation and chance involved. The IPSC rings are a trade-off, and while we have to think there has to be a better trade-off, we don’t have one to suggest right now.

Wrong penalties on the wrong things

The penalties assessed for time are probably too high, and those assessed for missing the target are too low. Particularly shooting a “hostage” or “bystander” — that should be not just a stage forfeit, but a tournament misconduct. Pushing speed and going mild on collateral negligence is not practical. In the real world, there are no backstops: solid hits are at a premium.

The bottom line

The bottom line on these sports is that they are, well, sports. They’re not without value — nothing motivates like competition, and speed and accuracy are things that are worth pursuing. But you should never mistake these stylized sports for actual preparation for combat. Two different animals.

There’s an irony in that, of course: the ATF recognizes none of these sports as sports, just as it is blind to game hunting with modern sporting rifles. Its idea of what is “sporting” is frozen in 1968.

In the end, competitive “practical” shooting is about as useful preparing you for a combat or defensive gun use as the Daytona 500 is to prepare you for your morning commute. So why do it?

The only reason we can come up with is: it’s a blast. There is that.

NYPD FIrearm Training… Sucks

Of course, if you read WeaponsMan you know that already, or if you were in any other way not asleep last August while a pair of New York’s Finest ventilated a wide variety of midtown objects, including one deserving murderer who pulled a .45 on them, and nine undeserving citizens who had the bad fortune to be in the beaten zone of the cops’ indiscriminate fire. A merciful God (or Chance if invocations of the Deity displease you) has done what NYPD would not, and protected the citizens in question: none of their wounds are life-threatening.

The murderer went down in a rare real-life example of the cliché, “hail of bullets,” and that’s a good thing; pulling a gun on a pair of POs should be functionally equivalent to Suicide by Cop, and no one can fault them for shooting. They also did better (than their NYPD peers have in the past) at securing from SHOOTEX once it was clear the threat was blown to East Jesus; there’s room for further improvement but it wasn’t the Amadou Diallo multiple magdump the Department is, fairly or unfairly, known for.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6W8cHwNuqH4

We can, however, fault the hell out of them for missing, at point-blank range. And we can fault them for wounding bystanders. That is the action of hopped-up drive-by gangstas, not trained police officers, and in a well-run department it would be a firing offense.

Yes, if you take time to aim, the bad guy might shoot you. That is a risk you assume when you step out on the streets in a police uniform. That’s why you will go to a funeral or two in your career. That’s why you get an early retirement, if you make it that far. It’s all part of the package.

But the thing is, these cops are not bad people, even if they’re dreadful combat shots (from looking at the video, it’s possible that one is actually OK and the bulk of the mayhem was produced by his irresponsible and terrified partner). If somebody’s a bad shot, it’s because he was not well taught 95% of the time (there is a 5% minority that just flat refuses to learn, usually because they know it all already and their brain has no room for further information. Those need to be sent to go excel elsewhere, but won’t be — thanks to Civil Service rules and adversarial union representation, which stands up unfailingly for the slugs and bums). So why are the NYPD’s officers so lousy at something that is not rocket surgery, and that anyone can learn with decent teaching and coaching?

The needle of implication quivers towards the teaching and coaching. Only a fool believes that all cops are created equal in ability, or that all cops have an interest in shooting. But they all have an interest in staying alive, and they all have the ability to shoot better than this, if they’re trained well. But is weak training a fact, or is it just our range-rat bias talking?

It turns out, the Department knows its cops suck at shooting, and they too wanted to know why. In 2007, Commissioner Ray Kelly commissioned (no pun intended) a study by the RAND Corporation, a FFRDC (Federally Funded Research and Development Corporation) that tackles tough analyses for government clients. RAND and its contractors spent over a year looking into police shootings, engagement psychology, engagement and training technology, and police firearms training in general, before writing a comprehensive report, which Kelly caused to be posted on the NYPD’s website (.pdf) but does not seem to have otherwise acted upon.

Here are some gems from RAND:

Accidental reflexive discharges occur without an explicit decision to shoot. In 2005, the NYPD recorded 24 cases in which a firearm was accidentally discharged (Hurley, 2006, p. 16). Four of the cases occurred when officers were loading or cleaning their weapons. Thirteen more cases were classified as accidental discharges that occurred while “handling the weapon.” Seven cases occurred during a “struggle with subjects.” In previous years, discharges were also recorded when officers were running, falling, or trying to force entry. No accidental discharges, however, were recorded in these cat- egories during 2005.

The more troubling type of discharge, and the one highlighted in the press as con- tagious shooting, is the intentional reflexive discharge. While it is often discussed as a group phenomenon, a single officer can also intentionally discharge his or her weapon out of fear and without knowing specifically what he or she is shooting instead of care- fully considering whether the situation meets the requirements for the use of deadly force. Typically, the officer is reacting to the sight and sound of other officers shooting and starts to shoot. An intentional reflexive discharge may involve as little as a single round being fired, or, when many officers are involved, a large number of rounds may be fired.

To prevent these types of accidental discharges, virtually all firearm-safety training, including the NYPD’s training, highlights the need to keep one’s finger outside the trigger guard except when actually firing the weapon. For officers to avoid bad habits in handling their weapons, this basic safety principle needs to be enforced even more than it is today in all firearm training, including target practice and requalifica- tion, Simunition and other simulator training, and tactical house training. When an officer rests a finger on the trigger in these exercises prior to aiming the weapon (e.g., at the low-ready position), the trainer should interrupt the exercise to ensure that proper firearm-safety habits are being developed.

Because accidental discharges virtually never occur with properly holstered weapons and NYPD pistols do not use an internal safety catch, the holster functions as the safety. Expanding training on holstering may reduce these unnecessary discharges.

The NYPD categorizes contagious shootings as intentional reflexive discharges and, together with accidental reflexive discharges, they make up the broader category of reflexive firearm discharge.

The general psychological research demonstrates that questioning people about the basis for a decision results in information that is highly unreliable. More specifi- cally, police officers are sometimes surprised that their weapons discharge, claiming that they never had a finger on the trigger. They sometimes do not accurately report how many rounds they discharged or how many times they reloaded their weapons.

You know what we’re going to say now. Yep: Read The Whole Thing™. Get thee hence and do it!

The report is thoughtful, evidence-based, and useful not just for New York but for everyone intereted in effective training and use-of-force operations. If it has drawbacks, it’s that it does not include the supporting data, and doesn’t seem to suggest any training solutions likely to address the problem.

There’s a real problem with police negligent, reflexive and contagious discharges. Google “Corporal Donald Taylor” if you want to see a cop who’s in deep trouble for a grossly negligent ND (whilst pistol-whipping a suspect) and his subsequent lying about it (the suspect, who has a history with the law but had done nothing in this instance, spent four months in jail while Taylor’s department backed his lies and tried to cover up video evidence). Google “Milton Hall Saginaw MI” for an instance of reflexive/contagious discharge that took place in one of the toughest situations cops face (mentally ill homeless man with a knife). Current training clearly isn’t doing the job.

The RAND report illustrates some of the issues at hand, but doesn’t take us to the solution. We have some ideas percolating on that issue.

The Past is Another Country: School of Musketry, MG Pioneers

school_of_musketry2The photo, taken over 100 years ago, was at the School of Musketry, in one of America’s oldest still-serving military installations, the Presidio of Monterey, California. The building these 1911 worthies pose before may in fact be one of the converted stables that were still used as instructional venues for many years. In the 1980s, they held the Slavic languages departments of the Defense Language Insititute.

At the time of the photo, the weapons issued to riflemen had just gotten out from under the label “musket,” even though the now-archaic term “musketry” remained in declining use for marksmanship for another decade or so in the English-speaking world. But by 1911, the muskets were gone, stored away, sold off, given to Grand Army of the Republic (Union vets’ version of the VFW/Legion) posts, whatever.

Marines Training on SpringfieldsRegulars had the world-class Springfield 1903, replacing both infantry rifles (muskets) and cavalry carbines, and inventors and engineers the world over were applying the latest developments in metallurgy and smokeless powders to the then-young concept of weapons that would reload and fire themselves. Many of these inventors were American, but they went overseas in search of customers as American military budgets lagged. But the young officers and sergeants of the School of Musketry followed the developments carefully.

Colt 1905 Auto PistolOfficers in the front row of the photo hold swords that, in 1911, were still not entirely ceremonial in nature, especially for cavalrymen (elsewhere in the Army, an ambitious young lieutenant from a military family was redesigning the cavalry saber with a straight blade for using on point in the charge, in the latest European practice. You may have heard of him: 2nd. Lieut. George S. Patton, Jr).  After all, an officer went to war 100 years ago with a whistle and the six shots his revolver held — the School had just finalized the radical new Colt Automatic Pistol, which offered another shot and a rapid reload, and safeties and lanyards optimized for mounted combat.

Some of the men who worked on that project must be in this picture.

These men don’t look quite like the soldiers of today. They’re smaller and leaner — even if we average in the 15% of today’s soldiers who are women, an idea these 1911 troopers would have found otherworldly. They’re almost all white (there is one man who may be a black enlisted man, possibly an orderly of some kind, or who may just be a white man in shadow).

Definitive information was rather hard come by in those days. In contrast to the 20th Century wall of manuals and regulations, or the modern dimensionless information resources on Army Knowledge Online, the school had a small library. How small? In 1916, after a move to Ft. Sill, OK, these were the books that might have been professional reading for the weapons man of a century ago.

  1. Fencing
  2. Mainly About Shooting
  3. Sharpshooting for Sport and War
  4. Irish Riflemen in America
  5. Report of Rifle Shooting in the U. S. under the Auspices of the National Board for the Promotion of Rifle Practice for the year 1908
  6. The Pistol and Revolver
  7. Suggestions for Military Riflemen
  8. The U. S. Revolver Association

These are not sections, mind you, but individual books. All of them. That was it — all the information the School of Musketry had on, well, musketry and related subjects, which the library categorized under “sport”. Don’t take our word for it. You can download the entire library catalogue here: School of Musketry Library, 1916. (pdf) On a dusty western post like Ft. Sill, or a pleasant seaside one like the Presidio of Monterey, books were rare and precious commodities.

And to get one of these books, of course, the interested soldier or officer had to physically go to the library. When it was open. And borrow the book. If someone else didn’t have it out already. There was no way to know if the book was in at the moment, short of going there and laying our own two eyes on its place in the stacks.

On the plus side, there was little risk of information overload.

Screen shot 2013-02-01 at 10.15.06 PMOne School officer from the Monterey days was 2nd Lieut. Parker K. Hitt. Hitt was a pioneer  of machine guns in the US Army. After he retired as a Colonel after a long and distinguished career, he penned an interesting reminiscence of his time in the School of Musketry for a professional journal, Military Review. It ran in July, 1960, a wonderful thread that ties together Col. Hitt’s youth 100 years ago, the dawn of the machine gun, and readers of this blog who were not yet born when Col. Hitt told his story, two and a half Army officer careers ago (a freshly commissioned 2LT who read this article in 1960 could have retired, certainly a Vietnam veteran, out of the Hollow Army of 1980. His son could have retired before 9/11). Take it away, Col. Hitt:

The School of Musketry was started at Monterey following one of the most significant military developments in the history of the United States Army. This was the issue of two Maxim machineguns to each infantry and cavalry regiment in 1906.

I was a lieutenant in the 22nd Infantry, with battle experience in the Philippines wit h the British one-pounder (pom-pom), the Gatling and the Colt machinegun. In the fall of 1906 I was placed in command of the provisional machinegun platoon which was authorized for the regiment.

MG squad B/2 Inf. circa 1917. Photo via SADJ.

MG squad B/2 Inf. circa 1917. Same guns, accessories and uniforms as Hitt’s men would have had in 1906. Photo via SADJ.

Machine gun doctrine was rather thin: “a single copy of a book by the Vickers-Maxim Company on the assembly and operation of the gun.” Questions on the history and technology of machine guns were referred to Captain John H. Parker, whose nickname, “Gatling Gun Parker,” came from his employment of that weapon at Santiago. (Parker and Hitt would settle a dispute over the superiority of the Maxim or the Gatling appropriately — on the range, with the Benet-Mercié machine rifle, an American Hotchkiss variant, also playing).

These initial guns were type-classified the U.S. Maxim Machine Gun, Caliber .30, Model of 1904. There’s an excellent and technically detailed retrospective on the weapon by Robert Segal online at Small Arms Defense Journal.  (He doesn’t note the genesis of the steam condensing hose, which is mentioned in Parker Hitt’s article). They look an awful lot like an early Vickers Maxim, and with good reason, as the first 90 were made by Vickers and serials 91-287 were made under license by Colt. They were chambered for the then-standard cartridge, .30-03.

Taking a Maxim to the field was not a light endeavor, the MG platoon requiring

10 pack mules, and pack equipment designed for horses. Each squad had one gun weighing about 58 pounds, and a tripod weighing about 52 pounds with tool, water, and ammunition load totaling about 800 pounds.

He remembered the guns fondly, but chafed at the parsimonious Ordnance Department ammo allocation: 500 rounds, per gun, per year. He managed to exceed that allocation a little… in Fiscal Year 1907/08, by over 20,000 rounds per gun.

For all this, Hitt records, the MG was a sideline at the School of Musketry:

The rifle was king in those days and a man went to the School of Musketry to have his chance to get in the Pacific Department rifle competition. I fired in the 1907 competition where we had the 40-round skirmish run and got a bronze medal with a score of 744.

The machinegun was a curiosity to the classes at the school. We let each member of the class fire a few rounds, showed them how to reduce jams, and had inspections of the platoon in field equipment, but otherwise I can remember no classwork.

Hitt also claims to have made the Army’s first reactive targets, that dropped when shot.

I think I was responsible for the first successful field targets used by the Army which would fall when struck by a bullet and yet stand in a wind. I made several models at Monterey, including a rotary one which turned over automatically when struck, exposing a fresh target. The drop targets were afterward taken up by the Ordnance Department, which manufactured them for a time.

During Hitt’s tenure, the School also tested the coming Army sidearm, as we mentioned above:

The first models of the Colt pistol were tested there and I found a way to make the pistol go off by juggling the safeties alone without touching the trigger. Colonel Marion P. Maus, president of the test board, was incredulous and on trying it for himself the gun went off and the bullet chipped a neat nick in the toe of his boot.

Presumably he is referring to the Colt Model 1905 Cal. .45 semiautomatic pistol. His time at the School in Monterey lasted until 1910, when his unit got orders to Alaska and he assumed command of a rifle company in Nome.

On returning from two years in the North, he was asked to take command of the machine guns again, to find that they’d never been unpacked in Alaska and his well-drilled crews had been dissipated. He had to start again from zero. Hitt would later serve in the Fort Sill iteration of the school in 1916/17 or so.

After teasing you with these excerpts from Parker Hitt’s excellent article, we would be remiss if we did not let you download the whole thing: A Brief History of the School of Musketry (.pdf)

Do it for the Children

Glock Drum MagYesterday we received an email from SARCO. Now, SARCO and dealers like it are like Diagon Alley for a certain kind of gun enthusiast; we couldn’t get by without it, while the muggles pass by completely unaware that it’s there.

They don’t always label stuff correctly. For example, they have what they call “M16A1 uppers” but they’re actually late transitional uppers that have one A2 feature (the Brunton bump ejected-casing deflector) with A1 sights, and are as used in the Canadian C7 and C8, and the weapon SF carried in the late 80s-early 90s, some of which were engraved “M16A1 Carbines” and others the first “M4 Carbines.”  All of which had 14.5″ barrels, some lightweight and .675 under the FSB and some A2 profile and .750. It’s a period piece for a very specific period, or for a Canadian rifle, so the part’s actually rarer than they think. (Without seeing the forging codes we can’t answer the Canuck-or-not question).

Anyway, in the email they mentioned that they had in stock something guaranteed to make bansters’ heads explode, and we ordered two of them for that very reason. It’s a Made in Korea 50-round drum for 9mm Glocks. It will make the handling of your gun go from slick Glock to brick block, but it enables you to talk to a crowd.

Fits All 9mm Glocks Including : 17, 19, 26 and 34

Pressure Release Finger Load Assist Button For Easy Loading. Fully Metal Lined Hardened Steel Insert. Incased by Space Aged Polymer.

Limited Quantities Available – Get it Now !!

via 50 Round Glock 9mm Drum Magazine.

(They keep saying “Space Aged Polymer,” but I don’t think those words mean what they think they mean. Ah, well).

Drum magazines are, with a couple of exceptions, toys. They do not really do much except offend hoplophobes, they diminish gun-handling (the greater the percentage of the weight of the loaded weapon attributable to the mag, the more awkward the gun, generally), and some of them are prone to jams or at least fiddly about ammo.

They’re less practical for defense or sport than multiple smaller mags, which is something mag-size-ban enthusiasts don’t grasp. So why buy one? Because they’re a blast when simply blasting. Sure, there might be some limited use for this thing with a carbine chassis, to the extent that one of those gimmicks has a use, but really the drum is just another gimmick. Where it comes into its own is with new shooters and kids, who enjoy firing long strings of centerfire rounds a lot more than they enjoy doing mag-changing drills.

So do it for the children.

You can almost hear the collective voices of the Acela-riding inbred Northeastern establishment warbling in ragged unison, “What do you need that for!?!!1!”

Just tell them it’s for hunting turkeys. It’s not like they actually know anything about hunting turkeys, either.

UK goes Glock

Glock 17 G4For the first time in 45 years, British general-purpose forces will be carrying a new pistol. The Ministry of Defence has awarded a large (almost $15 million) contract to Glock for 25,000 pistols, to replace the Brownings British forces have carried since the Summer of Love.

The new guns won’t be new to everybody — Certain British special operations forces have been using Glocks for some time.

While it’s certainly a feather in Glock’s cap to have the large (by European standards) UK MOD adopting their pistols, the company had the inside track from the beginning of the two-year process. With no UK producer, the MOD started with preferences in place for a European Community product. Several other pistols were evaluated along with several Glock models.

The most interesting part of the evaluation was the comparison of the Glock to the current service pistol, the Browning Hi-Power, which was adopted in 1967. (As far back as World War II it was in use by British SOF, but it was long after the war before the armed forces were willing to replace the classically British top-break revolver). Britain was the last major power to switch from revolver o semi-automatic service pistols, decades behind its peers, but the Browning Hi-Power was popular in UK service. Still, British soldiers familiar with the Browning found the Glock quicker to get into action, easier to master due to its simple manual of arms, and more accurate. The four more rounds per magazine were also welcome.

The pistol contract was an unusually high priority, given that pistols are secondary small arms. In recent years, personal defense weapons, once not taken very seriously by Britain’s fighting forces, have become more important. The serve crucial roles both as backup weapons in CQB and as always-with-you defensive weapons in the current situation in Afghanistan, where many recent British casualties have resulted from extremely close-range insider attacks.

The British are not buying any of the options normally elected by American SOF users of Glocks (extended mag and slide releases and night sights).  They’re getting a box-stock (or as an Englishman might say, bog-standard) G4 Glock 17.

This will give Britons a new way to get their hands on a state-of-the-art Glock: join the forces. Due to the national handgun ban for civilian users, the only way a Brit could get his hands on a Glock 17 prior to this announcement was to join a criminal gang or terrorist group.