That’s what Armalite admits after pulling the ad in a welter of condemnation from various official Italian sources. The ad depicts Michelangelo’s David armed with the David’s Sling of today, a .50-caliber sniper rifle. (The image embiggens).
Here’s a brief take from National Review:
The gun maker ArmaLite ran an ad as part of its “A Work of Art” campaign that features Michelangelo’s David holding a sniper rifle and has come under fire for it — from the Italian government, which owns the statue and claims it’s intellectual property.
In response to the ad, Italian culture minister Dario Franceschini recently tweeted, ”The advertisement image of an armed David offends and violates the law. We will act against the American company to make sure it withdraws the campaign immediately.”
Angello Tartuferi, director of the Accademia Gallery in Florence, where the statue is on display, told La Repubblica newspaper that Italy owned the copyright to David, saying “the law says that the aesthetic value of the work cannot be distorted. In this case, not only is the choice in bad taste but also completely illegal.”
ArmaLite has apologized for the ad and withdrawn it, saying it was “in poor taste.” “We deeply regret that ArmaLite offended anyone by this media campaign,” the company’s statement said. The ad was for the AR-50A1, a .50-caliber sniper rifle.
Now, who knows what evil dwells in the heart of Italian copyright law, but this is certainly not a copyright violation here in the USA.
And, is it in poor taste? We don’t think so. One of 2014′s projects is to build a larger gun room (or, to be accurate, to have one built for us) and we’d love to have a poster of this hanging there. What do you think?
“Princess,” one of the two slain cats in North Long Beach..
As seems increasingly common, these stories of depravity seem to come from places where guns are already outlawed, or at least, irrationally restricted. Make of that what you will, but this one took place in Southern California, where assault-weapon bans, “bullet buttons,” may-issue-but-not-to-the-likes-of-you pistol permits, and a generous social safety nethammock, have eliminated all causes of crime, and brought us into the new sunlit dawn of the New Soviet Man. Or something.
Except for the one paradise-dweller who didn’t get the word, and spends his days reenacting the Little Big Horn, with neighbors’ cats playing the role of Yellow Hair.
Long Beach Animal Care Services and police officers are searching for the person or people who used arrows to shoot and kill two cats in a matter of a few weeks in North Long Beach.
“This is very concerning especially when you realize there is a pattern,” said Ted Stevens, manager of the Animal Care Services.
Over the weekend, a woman brought her injured cat to Long Beach Animal Hospital with an arrow protruding from its abdomen.
Dr. Carl Palazzolo, treated the cat, but it ultimately died during surgery.
“No one should shoot a pet. Period,” Palazzolo said. “It should be everyone’s concern. It’s cruelty to animal and morally wrong and illegal. It’s that simple.”
This X-Ray shows how Princess was wounded with a field-point arrow. Surgery did not save the animal.
Photographs taken before the cat was taken into surgery Sunday evening showed how deep the the metal-tipped arrow entered the animal’s abdomen.
The cat was taken into surgery where Palazzolo was able to remove the arrow and put the lobe of the animal’s liver back into place, but the cat did not survive the surgery, he said.
The two cats were shot within a block or so of each other in North Long beach, in January and February respectively. There has been a lot of publicity about the case, but the police have made no arrests.
It goes without saying that the person who would do this to an animal is a serious threat to all of the human beings in his life.
49-year-old skydiver John Frost was lining up for a landing when something happened to him. That something was a Cessna 170, which hit his parachute canopy. Both skydiver and plane slammed to the ground, and to the amazement of passersby and the photographer who took these pictures, both survived.
It happened around 11 a.m. Saturday, when 87-year-old Sharon Trembley was doing takeoff and landing maneuvers in his private Cessna airplane from the South Lakeland Airport.
The Polk County Sheriff’s Office says that on Trembley’s third pass, the passenger-side wing of his plane became entangled in and then cut the strings of skydiving parachutist John S. Frost while they were less than 75 feet in the air.
Frost, 49, was flung to the ground and the plane nose-dived and crashed into the surface as well.
Dramatic pictures taken by photographer Tim Telford and distributed by the Sheriff’s Office capture the moment of impact between Trembley and Frost.
“Thought I’d have very exciting pics of a close flyby,” Telford tells 10 News. “Never in a million years did I think I’d see what I saw.”
Both men were transported by ambulance to Lakeland Regional Medical Center. Frost was treated and released, while Trembley was held for observation. Neither were seriously hurt.
Telford calls that a miracle. “The plane caught the side of the canopy, flipped the plane 180 degrees and flipped the skydiver into the air. You heard the airplane hit the parachute, which sounded like you falling on your face into your pillow; a ‘woof’ sound.”
The TV Station that featured this report, WTSP, notes wryly that Saturday was the annual Safety Day for the US Parachute Association, the sanctioning body for American sport parachuting.
Well, both men are safe! And they have an experience to dine out on. No harm, no foul, eh?
(And we sure hope we’re still flying at age 87. That would be nice. But we’ll pass on skydiver collisions — at higher altitude, that would have been fatal for both. There was a lot of luck in the air over Florida last Saturday).
Fox News Tampa has a more complete set of stills, and a video that, while shot from a distance and partly obstructed, shows (when they run it at full speed, not the usual step motion) how fast this event happened, and interviews the pilot.
So yesterday there was a decision from the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or, as everybody who doesn’t have to pretend to respect these asshats (because he practices law in their court) knows them, The Clown School.
In the instant case they had a perv who had spent his entire adult life, essentially, peeping, creeping, and shooting pictures up the skirts of women on the subway.
that the guy had to be acquitted, or actually, the case had to be dismissed.
and he had to be let go.
because there’s nothing wrong with what he was doing.
and so, he can go do it now all he wants.
While this decision has, predictably, drawn some flak, what hasn’t been tied to it as far as we know is the retirement (after the decision was made, but before it was revealed) of the Chief Injustice of the Clown School, one Roderick Ireland. Ireland was an affirmative action hire, put into place with explicit instructions to see that fewer violent felons get incarcerated. Ireland clearly wanted to clear the decks before the press got hold of the court’s unanimous pro-perv ruling.
The Governor likes the soft-on-crime court: “I think the morale in the court system and the sense by litigants that they have been heard and fairly treated is very, very strong right now, and I think that is about Justice Ireland.”
In fact, of the seven members of the court, a majority (4) are Deval Patrick appointees, appointed with a view to soften the state’s already laughably soft punishments for criminals. Criminals and their families are an important Patrick constituency.
In far-off Anglestan, where guns are outlawed and everyone has moved on to the bright sunlit uplands of a gun free zone world, there’s always that 5% doesn’t get the word. For example, there’s the local politician who had the bad judgment to keep an empty old war trophy locked in a cupboard.
A Conservative former mayor and veteran army reservist has been dramatically arrested in an early-morning police raid and charged with owning a live 70-year-old Nazi wartime gun.
Officers with search dogs swooped on the home of Councillor Jonathan Farmer, 56, of Wisbech, Cambridgeshire, and seized a German Walther PPK pistol dating back to the Second World War.
Police said they were acting on a tip-off and had a warrant to search his home for firearms. He will appear in court next Monday and could face a five-year jail sentence if found guilty.
Farmer – whose wife Susanah is acting town clerk of Wisbech – has temporarily stepped down from helping to run the local army cadet force.
Yes, yes! You definitely don’t want a man with a gun involved with the local Army cadet force.
He told the Fenland Citizen: ‘It was given to me by a friend, mainly because his wife wanted it out of the house. I just kept it in a cupboard.
‘When he gave it to me, he said not to fire it because it had been deactivated. He said it would blow my hand off, so I never did and I assumed it was pretty safe.
‘But I suppose I shouldn’t have kept it. It was a sentimental thing – and it’s a beautiful piece of engineering. My life as it was has been pretty much eviscerated.’
The Walther PPK handgun was a gift to the bomb disposal expert from a British veteran of the Battle of Monte Cassino in Italy in 1944.
The soldier took the deadly weapon, a much-treasured war souvenir, from a captured German officer, and Farmer – the former mayor of Wisbech – has owned it for 30 years.
Farmer was arrested on January 19, taken to a police station at Kings Lynn, Norfolk, and bailed.
Farmer served as mayor of Wisbech from 2008 to 2009 and is a member of both Tory-ruled Fenland District and Wisbech Town councils.
Now, to American ears, this British crusade against firearms of all kinds seems to be a bit excessive. At least they stopped doing it here after 1781, and what they do in their own backward little country is their own business, after all. But surely, this anti-gun policy, which has included a complete ban on handguns for almost 20 years, has had an effect in producing a crime free environment. Yes?
A man is in hospital after a ‘drive-by’ shooting where a gunman on a motorbike opened fire on a car as it crossed London’s Waterloo Bridge.
The motorbike is thought to have pulled up alongside a black Ford Focus before a pillion passenger – sitting behind the driver – shot the driver through the window.
Armed police were called to the scene and the victim, believed to be aged 22, was taken to hospital.
(Of course the British journalists are just as careful about the facts as their American peers: a photograph accompanying the article shows a Ford Focus identified as the victim’s car. It’s white. Maybe the reporter suffers from rare black-white color blindness).
Farmer faces trial on April 22, and is looking at five years in prison (BBC version of the same story). Sebastian calls it “destruction of history,” and his comments noted that, appropriately enough for a Nazi gun, Farmer was turned in by a police informer, which is apparently a career option in modern Britain.
Maybe not the whole state, but a lot of its citizens seem to be. The headline noted the 65 gun permits revoked for mental illness once SC started comparing its mental health database with its gun permit database. And the lede was the 12 concealed weapons permit applicants who were denied because they came up hot on the mental health check.
But the shocking thing to us was the assertion that the mental health unit of teh State Law Enforcement Division is adding 500 names a week to the database. How many South Carolinians are barking at the moon down there? That’s 26,000 nuts a year! SC has about 4.7 million inhabitants, so just a bit over 1/2 of 1% of them are going bats in a given year.
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) – The chief of South Carolina’s law enforcement agency says a law meant to prevent the mentally ill from buying guns has already led to 12 people being denied a concealed weapons permit.
Chief Mark Keel told legislators Friday that the State Law Enforcement Division has also revoked 65 permits because of the law approved last May.
The law ensured the names of residents declared mentally ill by a South Carolina court go into a federal database so they can be caught by a background check. It was already illegal to sell guns to someone who is mentally ill. But the lack of reporting meant gun shops didn’t get that information.
Keel says the agency’s new mental health reporting unit averages putting 500 names a week into the database.
The 87 mental patients (12 denials + 65 revocations) seem to be the tip of the nutberg.
So we thought we’d check some official data. Is a half percent of a state being nuts, we hate to use the word, but, normal? So we went to NIMH, which ought to have some good statistics on the nation’s laughing-academicians. Turns out, half a percent is nothing, according to the nation’s Official Keeper of the Nut Job Count:
An estimated 26.2 percent of Americans ages 18 and older — about one in four adults — suffer from a diagnosable mental disorder in a given year.1 When applied to the 2004 U.S. Census residential population estimate for ages 18 and older, this figure translates to 57.7 million people.2
Yipes, stripes! That means 1.25 million Palmetto Staters should be nuts, unless the state’s much saner than average.
Except it doesn’t seem right for more than one in four people to be laughing-academy material. So they break it down: 9.5% mood disorders (that doesn’t sound so bad, but wait); 18.1% anxiety disorders, 9.1% personality disorders, plus a percent or so for Schizophrenia or Autism. And it turns out that within each category, there are seriously disabling and “dude, you’re gunning for a phony disability” kinds of illnesses. They also count suicides as mentally ill, even when noting the peak suicide demographic is men over 85. (They might be despairing, but it’s hard to argue these elderly suicides are all nuts).
And yeah, “mood disorders” is a clinical term which doesn’t necessarily mean the teenage sulks, but could encompass full Norman Bates oughta-be-locked-up-itis.
Yes, their numbers don’t add up, and yes, they’re obviously not using the same definition as South Carolina.
Now, here’s another statistical check the Associated (with terrorists) Press reporter could have done, if he were interested in reporting rather than arguing. He could have asked himself… is the proportion of mentally ill people applying for pistol permits greater or lesser than average?
The last year for which SLED has posted the data is 2010, which shows a total of 119,340 pistol permits (the number is certainly much larger in 2014). That means:
The percent of SC residents who have a license is approximately: 2.5%.
The percent of LTC applicants who were revoked or denied for mental illness is approximately: 0.073%. That’s 73 thousandths of a percent.
And we wonder how many of these 87 will clear their names on appeal, because the mental illness adjudication applies to someone with a similar name, or was a transient thing (i.e. a period of depression not rising to the level of a disorder, resolved) years ago. But even if none of them do, it looks like the permit holders (and applicants) are saner than normal. Whatever “normal” is.
Able was I ere I saw Elba, is all we have to say about that.
While only up to 2010 stats are fully online, broken down by county, SLED (South Carolina Law Enforcement Division) has posted aggregate 2013 stats (the ones we want) as follows:
Active Permits as of December 31, 2013 —– 229,456
Permits Issued in 2013 ———————- 83,012
Permits Denied in 2013 ————————1,272
Permits Renewed in 2013 ——————— 38,617
Permits Revoked in 2013 ———————— 364
That means that:
The percent of SC residents who have a license is approximately: 4.9% as of December 31.
The percent of LTC applicants who were revoked or denied for mental illness is approximately: 0.038%. That’s 38 thousandths of a percent. The percentage who were denied and revoked for all purposes (including the nut jobs) is aboout 7/10 of a percent.
What, the guns? These three beautifully engraved guns by the late Indiana engraving wizard Ben Shostle — a Luger, a Mauser, and a Colt — are being auctioned as a lot by Amoskeag Auction Company of Manchester, New Hampshire next month. But as it turns out, it’s not the guns: it’s the grips.
The little .25 hammerless Colt 1908 is out of the woods. As you can see from the picture (and do embiggen it), the Browning-designed pocket pistol’s grips are mother-of-pearl.
But the grips of the other two guns are ivory. We’re reminded of the famous statement by George S. Patton Jr.: “Only a pimp in a whorehouse would have pearl grips on a handgun! My pistols’ grips are ivory.”
But as it turns out, there’s trouble with ivory.
Ivory is a natural material, which comes from the tasks of elephants. All three species’ tusks yield ivory, but the pure white, durable ivory we know on gun grips comes from African bush elephants, loxodonta africana. Because of habitat destruction and poaching, all elephants are endangered species. Therefore, traffic in newly-processed ivory has been banned for 25 years in the United States. In the rest of the civilized world, ivory that has been harvested in accordance with environmental and species-preservation best practices is still available for sale, with appropriate certifications. But the US does not accept that. So the only ivory you see on American guns is either old ivory, that predates the 1989 Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), or it’s false, artificial ivory. Doug Bandow writes at Forbes about the way the law has worked, right up until now:
Until now the rules were simple and sensible. Ivory imported legally, that is, prior to 1989 or after 1989 with CITES certification that international standards were met, could be sold. Older ivory usually can be identified by coloring, stains, style, wear, quality, subject, and more. Some features can be faked, but most of the older work simply isn’t replicated today.
Moreover, the burden of proof fell on the government, which had to prove that you violated the law. That standard is inconvenient for zealous prosecutors. But that’s the way America normally handles both criminal and civil offenses.
A new administrative rule promulgated by the Obama Administration (1) bans all sales of ivory items that are not documented as having been imported pre-1989; (2) establishes a presumption that all ivory, anywhere, in the USA, is contraband, a presumption that can only be rebutted with comprehensive documentation; and puts the burden on the possessor of the ivory to prove his innocence, whilst relieving prosecutors of the burden of proving anyone’s guilt.
The rules will be enforced by armed agents — including, we are not making this up, SWAT teams — of the Fish & Wildlife Service, which has been frustrated by the difficulty of finding and prosecuting actual poached-ivory traffickers, and has decided to pimp its confiscation and conviction numbers. To do this, it’s going to refocus on heirloom ivory by turning all possessors into criminals with a penstroke, and make lots of busts rapidly so as to have an excuse for increases in headcount and budget.
Resources have already been shifted from pursuing the criminal element — Bandow cites a pair of New York contraband dealers who were busted with millions of dollars’ worth of poached ivory — to targeting the easier-to-find heirloom market. The shift in the presumption of innocence and standard of proof means that the F&WS Fishtapo needn’t be inconvenience by that pesky Constitution or the blatherings of defense attorneys.
It is extremely difficult to differentiate legally acquired ivory, such as ivory imported in the 1970s, from ivory derived from elephant poaching. Our criminal investigations and anti- smuggling efforts have clearly shown that legal ivory trade can serve as a cover for illegal trade.
So they “solve” the problem, by making all ivory illegal. No decision for PC Plod to overheat his brain stem with; no pesky legal market. Not only do they no longer have to figure out who the illegal traffickers are hiding among the legal sellers, they don’t even have to look for the illegal traffickers anymore.
(Incidentally, that .pdf explains that the economic illiterates of the Fishtapo think that they’re reducing demand for ivory by destroying it… they explain how reducing the supply reduces the demand! Someone give those bozos the Nobel Prize for Inverted Economics).
We’re still looking for the actual NPRM, but if it’s as Bandow describes it, you know what else is banned? Bringing back your elephant trophy from an African safari. CITES allowed about 1430 sport-hunted elephants’ tusks to be exported from a variety of African nations last year, perfectly legally and with full international approval. After all, those nations use hunting as a key tool in wildlife management. Now, under the new rules, designed so that no Fishtapo agent need ever sweat, or even look for an actual criminal, to make a case ever again, they can’t be imported or possessed. Hell, they can’t be transported inter- or intra-state.
Whose idea was this? It’s hard to say, because it comes from Washington, where everybody lines up to cash his check, but no one lines up to take any responsibility. According to Bandow, the idea was cooked up in a star chamber somewhere in official Washington, with no input from the sort of people who might own an old Steinway with ivory keys — or an engraved, ivory-handled pistol.
Hat tip: Wizbang blog, which can’t resist snarking: “Of course, we know that Obama is interested in saving the animals from the land of his birth, and all, but…” Of course they’re joking.
A sharp and bloody civil war is raging in Ukraine, a war with ethnic, linguistic, political, and other roots in a deeply divided society. But you know why the civil war is bad? If you read the American press, it’s because of the guns. Gee, why didn’t we think of that!
The press is true to its antigun ethos, with one reporter arguing in a tweet that “protesters using firearms in Kiev” were “Horrible tactics – practically begging for a military crackdown.” Max Fisher’s “bitch had it coming” analysis of the protests tweet linked to this New York Times story, which also blames the protesters, not the police that are gunning them down:
“There will be many dead today,” Anatoly Volk, 38, one of the demonstrators, said. He was watching stretchers carry dead and wounded men down a stairway slick with mud near the Hotel Ukraina.
Mr. Volk said the protesters had decided to try to retake the square because they believed the truce announced around midnight was a ruse. The young men in ski masks who led the push, he said, believed it was a stalling maneuver by President Yanukovych to buy time to deploy troops in the capital after the authorities decided the civilian police had insufficient forces to clear the square.
“A truce means real negotiations,” Mr. Volk said. “They are just delaying to make time to bring in more troops. They didn’t have the forces to storm us last night. So we are expanding our barricades to where they were before. We are restoring what we had.”
Gunfire crackled around the Hotel Ukraina and protesters were hit in front of the Globus shopping mall. One protester walked near the fighting with a double-barreled shotgun slung over a shoulder.
“If our guys are dying, excuse me, what can I say,” said the man, who offered only his first name, Oleg. “If they didn’t use guns, the idea never would have come to us.”
The wide use of firearms in the center of the city was a new and ominous phase for the protest movement.
The essential divide in Ukraine is an ethnic one. Yanukovych and his party, fundamentally a neo-Soviet party, led by ethnic Russians and comfortable with subservience to Moscow. (Indeed, at every step in the instant crisis Yanukovich has sought and received instructions from his lord and master, Tsar Vladimir). They consider Ukrainians second-class citizens at best. The protesters are predominantly ethnic Ukrainians, who see the Russians through the prism of centuries of Russian oppression, including the Holodomor. On this map from CNN, Russian speaking regions are darker red:
The dynamic of ethnic-Russians-who-were-Soviet-era-overlords and local-ethnics-who-were-underlings has played out in the 14 non-Russia former USSR Republics and various former Autonomous Zones. It has come to shots in the Ukraine because the two parties are in rough demographic balance. This map, strikingly similar to the one above, shows the vote turnout — the Russophones voted for Yanukovych.
The peak of the current violence seems to have come when government sniper teams targeted protest leaders. US criticism of the crackdown has been ineffective in the light of Washington’s foreign and defense policy leadership vacuum. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel can’t even get his Ukrainian counterpart to answer the phone or return a call. If that’s not a sign of contempt, we don’t know what is.
Not everyone in the press has swung around to the neo-Soviet side where Fisher and the Times reporting team are comfortable. Sarah Kendzior has a piece in Politico, waspishly calling out Acela Corridor journalists like Fisher for “pretending to care about Ukraine.” Nicole Gervitz (whoever she is) did slam Max Fisher’s “bitch had it coming” tweet:
When people take up arms to protect themselves from the state that wants them dead, they are not “asking for it.”
Yeah. What she said.
The situation continues to develop apace. Security forces leaders, including reportedly lost their stomach for internal violence and have sworn loyalty to the nation, implying their willingness to maintain order for a new regime. Opposition politician Yulia Tymoshenko has been released from prison, and parliament has deposed Viktor Yanukovych, former President.
Yanukovych fled by helicopter, with a few personal followers, to the ethnic Russian city of Kharkhov (of tank battle fame) in eastern Ukraine, a hotbed of neo-Soviet sentiment. Other Yanukovych loyalists fled by vehicle convoy.
The leaders weren’t being impeded in their flight by the protesters, but police and Interior Ministry forces, especially snipers, who fell into demonstrators’ hands were being beaten. The switch of the Interior Ministry, police, and Berkut troops to the demonstrators’ side may prevent further bloodshed (on both sides) for now.
The essential problem that Ukraine is divided politically has not been solved; if anything, the divisions are now more bitter. Right now, reconciliation looks like a harder path than partition. The situation remains fluid.
It all started with a thread on a forum called Snipers’ Hide… but wait, it didn’t really, because Tactical (that word again) Rifles (website, tacticalrifles.net) and Sniper’s Hide go way back, kind of like Njal and Gunnar in Njal’s Saga. The thread contained this video. Be forewarned, it’s 11 minutes of purest gunsmithing fail:
To put this in perspective, Tactical Rifles charges thousands for one of these rifles. Many thousands. And that one was so jacked up a real gunsmith ran up an additional $1,500 or so fixing it (Some of which he rebated, because he felt so bad for the poor throg who got stuck with it).
Once the video was posted on that thread, a shill for TR — a bozo who cannot string together a simple declarative sentence without more spelling and grammar errors than he has fingers to count them on, jumped on to that thread to suggest that the buyer of that rifle, Jeff, or the distinctly non-bubba smith in the video, Marc Soulie, deliberately sabotaged the rifle.
I had my local smith redo the bedding and cut the pillars to the correct length allowing the bottom metal to sit flush. The trigger pull weight problem was due to it being jammed against the stock side. It was also re-crowned and the bottom metal release adjusted. I put a set of NF rings on it. The scope seems to be fine other than cosmetic damage. The rifle shoots very well now (1/3 to 1/2 MOA).
He reports that the scope had damage because the Tactical Rifles crew substituted their own rings for the Nightforce (NF) rings. In pictures accompanying the post, the rings appear to be non-lapped. The rifle did not shoot remotely that well as received from TR.
They charged him over $8,000 for that rifle. They charged him full retail for the Nightforce scope (a good optic), and then he didn’t even get the first-quality rings that came with the scope.
Hey, but maybe it’s just that everybody at Sniper’s Hide has the knives out for Dave Rooney and his company, Tactical Rifles. So let’s look at another forum, Sniper Forums.com and see how did a guy do, who spent $7300 plus for a Tactical Rifles “M40″? (TR publicity shot of an “M40″ in .338, not this guy’s .308):
After a very long wait from order to receiving the rifle I had been on a roller coaster of anticipation and delay. I picked it up on Monday 12/16/2013 and finally got to the fire it Wednesday 12/18/13. Unfortunately by the time I received the rifle most of my joy of waiting for the rifle had been taken because I had to have an attorney contact the company after a wait of over 2 years (the industry standard is about 10 months).
When I finally received the rifle, I was very disappointed with the cosmetics of the rifle itself. As you will read in the review below, there are several issues that I should not have had to deal on a custom rifle that cost $7300 (price includes Nightforce NXS 5.5-22ZS Optic). It was very disappointing and disheartening. Of course after some of the ups and downs of waiting over 2 years for it, when I went to pick it up I had the question in my mind of “I wonder what’s wrong with the rifle?”
Surely there can’t have been anything wrong with the gun, can there?
When I received the rifle, the hydrographics job they did was lacking at best. Again, it should have been pristine for the amount of money that I spent. Around the safety switch the hydrographics looked sloppy and around the flush cups the hydrographics are cracking and chipping. My flush cups were not “flush” on the rifle at all and the QD swivels that I had purchased were not sent at all. When I picked up the rifle, the magazine was shipped separately so I did not have that with the shipment. The only paperwork I received was a letter stating that the magazine and other accessories were shipped separately. The rifle had not been cleaned, and was told by the owner that this was proof that the rifle had been test fired. As far as the rifle scope rings, bolt, action and scope, all were tight and looked great. I took the rifle home and waited for UPS to receive the rest of my accessories. Of course they didn’t show up until 2 days later.
When I did receive the accessories, all that I received was the 5 round magazine and the packaging and allen wrench of the TR Scope Rings. I did not receive any serial numbered target that I was told would come, nor did I receive a T-Shirt that they said they would be sending. The t-shirt isn’t a big deal, it was just a little frustrating when I was told to be expecting things and didn’t receive them. I also received no invoice, paperwork about the rifle, nor did I receive any documentation regarding the Nightforce Scope or the Manners Stock.
To be fair, I sent Dave Rooney, President of Tactical Rifles and email explaining my disappointment of the hydrographics and flush cups. He was very quick to call me back and said that he would be glad to redo the hydrographics and fix the flush cups at no cost. His only request was to do it after the Christmas holidays. I also emailed them about the QD swivels and the missing paperwork and was told that I would be receiving them in the mail, but as you can imagine I have received nothing to dated.
I must say that the waiting period, missing accessories and documentation and the cosmetic issues are a huge strike! The shoddy work on the hydrographics and flush cups really put me over the edge. I really like Dave Rooney and he has been a great person to speak to. Either that, or he is really a great talker, but the weight of the issues, considering what I paid for the rifle, is just too much.
The rifle wasn’t a complete loss for that fellow — his, he says, shoots “great.”
But wait, it gets better. When the whole Sniper’s Hide/Tactical Rifles imbroglio got started, in 2008, Sniper’s Hide did TR a favor by stopping a disgruntled ex-employee from bashing the company on the site. Then, TR was grateful… briefly. By 2010, and again in 2012, TR was threatening the site with lawsuits.
Finally, they filed one this year, and it’s a doozy. This really needs 1st Amendment law expert Ken White to take the mighty cluebat to it, and beat it about the face and kidneys; but for the time being, technology web site TechDirt.com has done a pretty good job. Its summary:
Once again, TRI makes no attempt to back up its “fake video” assertions, apparently relying on the court to somehow read into Soulie’s words something that’s clearly not there. Then TRI goes further, claiming the “false accusations” are so clearly libelous that it doesn’t even need to prove they’re libelous. Somehow, TRI’s legal rep feels the statements are so obviously libelous that she doesn’t even need to cite any of them in her filing or even specify which “clearly libelous” posts should be removed. …
TRI is also seeking an injunction against the defendants to prevent further derogatory posts and demands the removal of current, allegedly libelous posts related to TRI. Again, the filing fails to indicate which posts offend and should be removed, leaving TRI’s perception of libel (or slander, as the lawsuit uses interchangeably) to the reader’s imagination. …
What we’re left with is something that gives every appearance of legal threats being used to shut down critics, which isn’t how the system is supposed to work. The filing goes long on motive and speculation, but provides very little in the way of actual, provable facts — the very definition of a frivolous lawsuit, one which appears to have been filed solely in hopes of blustering TRI’s critics into silence.
Until we get Ken to apply the Popehat Clue-Miter to the instant lawsuit,which reads like it was drafted by a graduate of the Matchbook University School of Law and HVAC Repair, who slept through the module on the difference between “libel” and “slander,” that will do. Read The Whole Thing™. Tactical Rifles.net is about to discover something called the Streisand Effect. (Indeed, we wouldn’t be shocked if we were the last gunblog to weigh in). Making an Icelandic saga out of some guys criticizing your 3rd World workmanship on the net? Go for it, but as we remember, it didn’t entirely end well for Njal.
By Bloomberg logic, if you have a hammer on your workbench you’re as guilty as this schmo. We have about nine different hammers; is than an “arsenal”?
Cripes. How many times is this?
Saturday morning, officers arrested Vinayak Shanbhag after the son told his mother he had pummeled the elder Shanbhag repeatedly on the head with a 10-pound sledgehammer while the father slept. Vinayak Shanbhag later told police that he and his father had been “playing puzzles” and his father made a remark that bothered him. The suspect said he thought about the remark all night and decided to attack his father, an arrest report shows. Police who responded to the residence on Unabelle Drive discovered a grisly scene where even the bedroom walls were “covered in blood.”
Barker said the suspect has a history of mental illness and being violent to other family members in the past.
The father, Panduran Shanbhag, is a professor of chemistry at Bethune-Cookman University in Daytona Beach. Young Shanbhag had a promising academic research career himself — he was a co-author on a peer-reviewed molecular biology paper before he was 20, having graduated at age 15 — before being overcome with mental illness. He lived with his parents in a house in Holly Hill. His mother lived in a separate room and didn’t hear the crime, just her husband coughing, which was normal as he’s had a cold lately.
While the crime is a monstrous one, the banal motivations of the average murder seem absent here — this is mental illness straight up. And people will cry do something but the only possible response is, do what exactly? The best thing we could do is reestablish custodial resident care for the seriously mentally ill — which would be very expensive — and pour money into basic research, which guarantees nothing, really. But the ideas people come out with, whether they involve ridiculous notions like banning weapons (how could that have prevented this horrible crime?), or making lists of the mentally ill and restricting or surveilling them various ways (again, how would this have helped here?) are Orwellian and futile.
Professor Panduran Shanbhag remains alive, in critical and guarded condition in the hospital.
In this story, which gives the Professor’s name as Pandurang with a “g”, Howard Koplowitz says that the charge is now murder, implying that the Professor succumbed to his injuries. However, he cites the Daytona News-Journal and the N-J does not report that the professor has died. Indeed, no other story anywhere, except ones drawing from Koplowitz, say the charge is murder, not attempted murder. In fact, the N-J reports Vinayak P. Shanbhag as being charged with attempted first-degree murder with a firearm;the “firearm” bit is probably a clerical error.