Here’s an interesting appreciation of the Jimenez J.A. NINE 9mm pistol, an el cheapo blowback 9 x 19 pistol, as sold to those self-defenders who can’t spend $200 after tax on a pistol, and as disparaged by all right-thinking pistoleros.
The Jimenez has an interesting corporate history and uses some purpose-selected manufacturing technology. The die-cast Zamak parts (the cheap pot metal used in cast toys, like Matchbox cars) are cast to near-net shape, and that keeps costs down. The simplicity of the pistol does, also. (It also means the heavy slide and stiff spring are hard for some percentage of humans to manipulate). Everywhere you look in the design, you see that simplicity and low cost were the design objectives. Aesthetics and durabilty and, really, everything else, took a back seat. For instance, look at the magazine floorplate with its clever little bend.
It’s not a Glock, but you can’t buy a Glock for the price of this. Not a used Glock. Not for the price of two Jimenezes (Jimeni?), actually. (Ugh. Vision of dual-wielded Jimenez pistols whilst leaping through the air in a Hollywood blockbuster). But it works with cheap ball ammo (which is what it will almost certainly be loaded with, the cheapest 9mm in the store), and it hits a price point that poor people can meet.
Yes, they can get better used guns for that money, if they shop around and know what the hell they’re doing. But who knows what he’s doing, when he buys his first gun, if he didn’t grow up in it? For most of the people who buy these, it’s a rational buy.
Now, two kinds of people tend to tut-tut at the Jimenez and its Jennings and Bryco ancestors. Those are gun snobs like us, and anti-gunners. We tend to dismiss the pistol as cheap junk, and the anti-gunners have named guns like this Saturday Night Specials. And it’s true: every Monday morning, there’s probably a couple of Jimenezes or their antecedents in the evidence lockers of Chicago. But many thousands of these are made — almost a quarter million in the last five years, according to official ATF production reports.
|five-year total of Jimenez production:||229680|
This sounds like a lot of guns, but in the grand scheme of things, it isn’t. It’s half a year’s SIG domestic handgun production, for instance, but spread over five years. Still, it’s obvious that for all that the gun-ban groups like to call them Saturday Night Specials, and even our fellow gun culture members dismiss them as, for example, “evidence-locker stuffers,” most of these guns must not be used in crime… instead, they’re the home-defense gun of choice for the home defender who doesn’t have any of the good choices that most of us take for granted.
The history of Jimenez is interesting. It is the descendant of several companies that made small, cheap pistols in California and Nevada. The ur-founder was George Jennings, whose original product was the Raven .25, and his son Bruce and son-in-law Jim Davis founded various similar companies making similar firearms. Their names include Raven, Jennings, Bryco, Lorcin, and some others. Jennings and Bryco were sued into nonexistence in the California courts after one clueless idjit shot another clueless idjit with one. (He didn’t know that if you take out the mag the gun still has a round in the chamber, and he pointed it at his friend and pulled the trigger. Moral of story: choose better friends. But a California jury thought that was proof that the gun was unsafe. Moral of story: choose better states).
How the same apparent operation went from Jennings to Jimenez is a tangled tale. The story in the industry is something like this: at the bankruptcy auction, the high bidder for Jennings’s assets was one Jimenez, previously a foreman at the company. The source of his half-million dollar bid is not clear. Jennings/Bryco had operated in California under some kind of questionable deal where the company’s pot-metal pistols passed the California tests that Colt and S&W and SIG flunk all the time, to the benefit, no doubt, of some state official’s off-the-books retirement fund. That same dope deal wasn’t available to Jimenez, so he relocated to Las Vegas and later Henderson, Nevada.
Former owner Bruce Jennings sheltered some of his assets by redomiciling in Florida. Under the Florida homestead law he was able to shelter assets from the judgment by investing in an expensive home. As far as we know, while the plaintiff’s attorneys got paid (being lawyers, they always pay themselves first), the actual plaintiffs, we believe, have gotten skunked.
That was not Jennings’s only unhappy result in a courtroom. For one thing, he had previously been convicted for busting his wife’s jaw, in 1985.
[I]n a newspaper interview in 1992, Jennings admitted that he had assaulted his wife. “I lost my cool, and I hit her,” he said. “My wife had taken all the bonds, the Rolexes, the diamonds and the gold.”
And he would subsequently be convicted for some kind of child porn or child sex offense, and is now Federal Inmate number 57403-018, who’ll get out in 2020-something, if he lives that long. That is some of the ugly backstory to this ugly gun.
It’s fair to say that this unlovely and unloved firearm is not going to evolve into a swan. That only happens in fairy tales, kids. But it does fill a market niche, and