Author Archives: Hognose

About Hognose

Former Special Forces 11B2S, later 18B, weapons man. (Also served in intelligence and operations jobs in SF).

What we’re getting into in Syria….

A French soldier holds an SA-7 Strela (Grail) tube in Mali.

A French soldier holds an SA-7 Strela (Grail) tube in Mali. Click to enlarge. Image: French Army.

…is about what we got into in Libya. By waiting until the tiny sliver of the opposition that had something in common with American values had been exterminated by the ruthless regime, and until the only functional opposition remaining was hard-core Islamist, we’re going to be sending arms that will be used against Americans and our allies, not only by these groups and all their islamist-warrior pals, but also by moslem terrorists.

The unintended consequences of the foreign policy of dithering-away-any-advantage in Libya are what our allies, the French, are dealing with in Mali, and it’s pretty ugly. Qaddhafi’s tens of thousands of MANPADS are turning up in terrorist hands in the poor, bedraggled, and now war-torn African nation. So far, nos amis have captured a launch tube, a battery, and several copies of an Arabic-language manual covering all the major Russian MANPADS. A story based on AP reporting:

The manual… adds to evidence for the weapon found by French forces during their land assault in Mali earlier this year, including the discovery of the SA-7′s battery pack and launch tube, according to military statements and an aviation official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn’t authorized to comment.

The knowledge that the terrorists have the weapon has already changed the way the French are carrying out their five-month-old offensive in Mali. They are using more fighter jets rather than helicopters to fly above its range of 1.4 miles (2.3 kilometers) from the ground, even though that makes it harder to attack the jihadists. They are also making cargo planes land and take off more steeply to limit how long they are exposed, in line with similar practices in Iraq after an SA-14 hit the wing of a DHL cargo plane in 2003.

Header of Page 313 (start of the SA-7 section) of the captured manual.

Header of Page 313 (start of the SA-7 section) of the captured manual.

The Malian terrorists, “Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb” as they style themselves, were training international terrorists to attack aircraft with the SA-7 missile. The elderly SA-7 was ineffective against military aircraft even in the 1980s, and so it’s probable that this training was intended to facilitate terror attacks on civil jetliners.

In Timbuktu, SA-7 training was likely part of the curriculum at the ‘Jihad Academy’ housed in a former police station, said Jean-Paul Rouiller, director of the Geneva Center for Training and Analysis of Terrorism, one of three experts who reviewed the manual for AP. It’s located less than 3 miles (5 kilometers) from the Ministry of Finance’s Budget Division building where the manual was found.

Neighbors say they saw foreign fighters running laps each day, carrying out target practice and inhaling and holding their breath with a pipe-like object on their shoulder. The drill is standard practice for shoulder-held missiles, including the SA-7.

Here’s the manual in question: http://hosted.ap.org/specials/interactives/_international/_pdfs/al-qaida-papers-dangerous-weapon.pdf

The manual does note that the weapon has a secondary military use, even if it does not destroy many aircraft. It does change their flight profiles, causing them to fly higher and degrading air support to ground troops.

 

But I heard DHS bought all the Ammo?

out of ammoHow bad is the ammo situation? This bad: even the feds in the Department of Homeland Security are complaining that their training and duty ammo supply has been cut way back.

So yeah, it’s bad. And while some previous shortage items seem to be easing as supply catches up with demand — generic AR-15s, for example — ammunition in popular calibers continues to be hard to find.

A recent visit to Kittery Trading Post, an excellent outdoors megaseller that in normal times never ran out of ammo, found no 9mm, nearly no .40, no M193 or equivalent 5.56 (and very limited M855, unless you wanted to buy a barrel of it for $6,995.00), and most bizarrely, no .22LR.

This wasn’t even the ultra low supply of .22LR that we saw there six weeks or so ago, where the only rounds left were oddball imports, nosebleed-expensive match ammo, and shorts. There was no .22LR. Hell, there was no .22 Short or even CB caps, as far as we could see.

The supply of components is really bad, too. Manufacturers that don’t make all their own components (which is most of them) are therefore in a jam. Their customers are screaming for more supply, but the makers are as flat-out as they dare go. The easy ways to add capacity (overtime or a second shift, for example) add wear and tear on machinery, and risk leaving you with a room full of workers and no feedstocks. Primers are a particularly unreliable stock right now.

There are strong incentives for manufacturers to increase production in this market, but their ability to do so is under many constraints. If you hire more workers, you are on the hook to pay them, or get whacked by unemployment insurance. The “Affordable Care Act” has increased the cost of full-time employees, and who are you going to get to work a part-time third shift? And the theoretical capacity of a Camdex machine and its actual potential on a real production floor aren’t remotely the same thing. (You could buy more machines, but guess who also has a backlog?)

Ammo StockpileSo how bad is the ammo situation? A few of us are looking at buying into an ammo company. But our concern is: what happens when the market finally does equilibrate and start clearing normally? Prices will probably be sticky initially, but a lot of ammo makers will be grinding out commodity ammo, and if demand slackens they’ll be unable to resist cutting prices to sustain sales and production.

In our opinion, that must happen at some time for centerfire ammunition. The ammo producers are making more and more of it, and shooters aren’t necessarily shooting more. In fact, they seem to be shooting less, as they stockpile against the proverbial rainy day, and a supply of replacement ammo is not assured. Before 2012, most shooters operated on a near-just-in-time basis: they maintained a small operational “float” of ammo at home, but they replaced fired training and proficiency ammo as they went. Now, nobody feels secure doing that. Where you might have been comfortable with 1000 or even 500 rounds at home in case of a week’s interruption of supply, we’ve now seen eight months of unreliable supply at retail.

While shooters are puzzled, economists aren’t

Shooters are puzzled; they’ve never seen this before. Economists, though, aren’t puzzled at all.  They’ve seen it all before, although not in the case of ammunition. Instead, it’s been shortages of other items, like gasoline after the Arab oil embargo of late 1973 or the Iranian collapse into lawless Islamism in 1978.

People behave in predictable ways when shortages loom, and these ways, while rational from the point of view of individual actors, are disastrous for the economy as a whole.

 

What about the manufacturers?

Again, the manufacturers are running flat out, or as nearly so as their feedstocks allow. Hodgdon, the powder manufacturer, is hearing from angry customers, or would-be customers, who can’t find the company’s reloading powders. It has an outstanding FAQ on this issue. Here’s a couple of the questions, but we suggest you Read The Whole Thing™ (pdf).

Q: Are you still making powders?
A: We are shipping more powder this year than we shipped last year. We are shipping as fast as the powder is available. The real problem why you are seeing empty shelves is demand. The demand for powder (and all ammunition and components) is far greater than the supply from the manufacturers. We just cannot make enough to feed this demand right now. No one wants to ship more during this time than we do.

Q: Are you still in business?
A: Yes, Hodgdon is here for the long haul. We are doing everything we can to supply our powders. Dealer’s shelves are empty because powders are being purchased as soon as they arrive at the Dealer’s stores.

Q: What is causing this high demand?
A: The current political climate can have the regulatory consequence of impacting law abiding, hard working shooters and hunters. This has caused extremely high demand on all shooting industry products resulting in empty shelves, long back-orders, and on-line auction sites asking exaggerated prices.

We especially like one comment Hodgdon makes:

Q: I have seen/heard many rumors and conjecture on the cause of this powder shortage. A: If you do not hear it from Hodgdon Powder Company please don’t believe it.

A very similar comment was made by Hornady some months ago, including the plea for shooters to believe the company’s statements, not gunshop rumors or internet forum bloviating. Remember, these companies do not want to cut off sport shooters and self-defense shooters who practice a lot. They are their primary market. Hornady, for instance, sells less than 5% of their production to government at all levels — the other nineteen twentieths they sell to you and me.

But I heard DHS bought all the ammo?

hollywood ammoSo we agree this shortage is not the result of manufacturer cutbacks. After all, what sane manufacturer would cut back when he can sell every unit he makes at almost any reasonable price? But it is also not the result of DHS purchases. Seriously, if you’re a shooter, you probably know someone who’s a DHS agent: Border Patrol, Coast Guard, Customs (same agency as BP now), ICE and Secret Service are the big armed agencies within the sprawling department, and all the IGs have armed agents as well. If you know somebody from one of those outfits (or many somebodies), if you have a business card in your desk, call up and ask him or her. You’ll get an earful. All these agents have gone in the same period from having, essentially, all the training and qual ammo they want, to being very, very restricted on training ammo. (They do burn a lot of ammo on quals, compared to local PDs. The typical 1811 / Criminal Investigator shoots the table twice every every time for record and has to qualify semiannually or quarterly, and that’s the same deal in DHS and DOJ). The stories they hear from their higher on the tightness of ammo supply vary: some say this is a reaction to DHS’s bad press on the ammo purchases, some say it’s that even DHS, with its contracts for billions of rounds in place, can’t get the ammo it actually needs in the here-and-now beyond the bare basics of maintaining armed agent proficiency. But they’re all restricted on bullets, right now, in summer 2013.

So here’s what we think is happening with .22 in particular

Rimfire ammunition is a special case. Billions and billions of rounds are made, but there’s none on the shelves. Customers are buying as much as they can get, even though prices have ballooned. Retailers are ordering it but can’t get as much as they would like (and they, in turn, restrict sales to their customers). Ammo manufacturers are running at capacity. So where’s it all going? We think there are four prominent contributing factors.

  1. There’s a ton of new shooters, and shooters with new guns. Tens of millions have new guns have found new owners, and retailers tell us a high percentage of them are first-time buyers, and another large segment is people long away from shooting or gun ownership that are coming back to it. The entire demographics of shooting is changing, as a visit to a range will show you. These new shooters need ammo, and their mentors and trainers need ammo to train them with. That’s not all of it, but it’s one factor.
  2. Economists know that when the price or availability of a desired good rises, one predictable effect is the consumption of an alternative good in its place. The .22 rimfire is the long-standing alternative to expensive and scarce centerfire calibers like 5.56, 7.62, 9mm and .40. As a result, the shortage of any one of these calibers becomes, in time, a shortage of .22; and to a lesser extent it becomes a shortage of all of these calibers.
  3. People who were comfortable buying shooting and hunting ammo day-of or day-before have been spooked by the shortage into carrying an inventory. The longer the shortage continues, the more of these guys there are, the more of an inventory they feel they need. Exercise for the reader: if you shoot 500 rounds a week, how many rounds do you need to weather six months’ disruption in supply? Before you say we’ll never have six months’ disruption, stop and think: we’re in about month eight of a shortage right now. People who never stored ammo before are hoarding it now, and people who hoarded it already are hoarding more. This is probably the single biggest factor.
  4. People who concentrate on preparedness, for example the readers of Jim Rawles’s website and novels, have realized that .22LR ammo is a lasting store of value that has more stability in good times and bad than currency or even gold. (If the rule of law collapses, gold may still have value but may be difficult and risky to exchange). We think this is a larger factor. A lot of people who aren’t going to get fully on board with preparedness and move to the mountains like Jim recommends, will still take incremental actions like storing necessities: food, drinking water, and .22 ammo.

Note that except for #3, these effects are on all popular ammunition calibers and loads. Ammo’s not unobtainium, but it’s more difficult than it’s been in living memory of any but the very old who recall the Depression and wartime rationing and suspension of civilian ammo production. In the modern case, a more prosperous shooting public than existed in the 1930s and 40s are quickly snapping up the ammo that gets to retailers as soon as it arrives, regardless of attempts by retailers to ration ammo.

The one conspiracy theory that may have something to it, given that ATF management has been working with Democrats in Congress on drafting new gun restrictions, is that ATF is slow-walking import documents. But while we’re hearing that from the Congressional side, we haven’t heard the complaints of importers. We might not, though: whether it’s true or not, many importers seem to believe that being quoted “bad-mouthing ATF” (and that is how ATF classifies any criticism, however legitimate, by a licensee) brings about import document death by bureaucracy. But even if rimfire ammo imports went to zero, the domestic producers make vast quantities. CCI alone makes 4 million rounds of rimfire a day on a one-shift cycle.

The bottom line: you can’t find ammo to buy because everyone else is looking at the same time, and every damned one of us is buying whatever we find. The problem will ease when the market is saturated, and not before. It must ease at some time, because every dollar spent by an individual consumer on ammo is not spent on anything else. The ammo market has already absorbed more of those dollars than anyone could have predicted. So we know the end of the shortage is coming, we just don’t know when.

Freedom Group CEO defends Bushmaster

10x10_Bushmaster-Logo_V01In an excellent and wide-ranging interview, the Washington Times’s go-to-gal on guns, Emily Miller, sits down in New York with Freedom Group’s CEO George Kollitides. The Freedom Group is the firearms business unit of the Cerberus venture capital fund. It comprises some 15 brands that are household names in the industry, not just Bushmaster as the headline suggests, but also:

  1. REMINGTON
  2. REMINGTON MILITARY
  3. REMINGTON LE
  4. REMINGTON PMPD
  5. DPMS / Panther Arms
  6. PARA USA
  7. ADVANCED ARMAMENT
  8. MARLIN FIREARMS
  9. H&R 1871
  10. DAKOTA ARMS
  11. TAPCO
  12. PARKER GUNMAKERS
  13. BARNES BULLETS
  14. MOUNTAIN KHAKIS

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/14/bushmaster-ceo-reflects-on-newtown/print/

(Note: that link is to the print page, which will launch your print dialog box. Just cancel it. This is necessary because the Times page is infected with the Undertone spam/virus/malware).

Here’s a few highlights:

  • Kollitides rejects attempts to blame the gun, or himself (yes, Miller has examples of that) for criminal misuse of his weapons. Of Sandy Hook, he notes:  ”It’s very easy to blame an inanimate object. Any kind of instrument in the wrong hands can be put to evil use. This comes down to intent — criminal behavior, accountability and responsibility. [The killer] killed the gun’s owner, stole her car, stole her gun and then went to a school and killed innocent kids. No background checks could have prevented that. He illegally obtained the guns….He was intent on killing, which we know is already illegal.”
  • Cerberus didn’t put Freedom Group on the block because it was ready to cash out. Miller confirms what we noted last December, that it was due to pressure from the functionally bankrupt California State Teacher’s Retirement System (CalSTRS), which we noted in a follow-up in March was one of two crooked (we use the word advisedly, see the article) retirement funds run as a slush fund by anti-gun Cali politician Bill Lockyer.
  • Kollitides is proud of Bushmaster’s name and its products, not to mention its financial results (the details of which are not forthcoming, and are hard to tease out; it’s one product line embedded in a privately held company).
  • He has zeroed in on several ways to forestall potential crimes, approaches that might actually work without interfering with civil rights: ”A better mental health system. Accountability of neighbors and parents… armed guards in schools.”
  • And he points out that guns are inherently hazardous.

Normally, we’re eager to encourage people to Read The Whole Thing™ but in this case we have to ask you to exercise caution, at least until the Times gets its Undertone spam situation sorted out. 

Unfortunately Miller doesn’t publish any Q&A about Bushmaster or Freedom Group financials or product plans, at least in this interview.

Sunday is Father’s Day

Which we realized (old SF friend visiting to talk, what else, guns and UW) when there was hella line in the breakfast place this morning. Then we saw this:

obama_fathers_dayNot a Photoshop. As God is our witness, tweeted by the White House its ownself: https://twitter.com/whitehouse/status/346032124979195906/photo/1

The site appears to be the Aspen pool at Camp David, and for once we can’t identify the gun.

So, what can we say except Happy Father’s Day to Barack Obama and all the other gun-toting dads out there.

 

What happens when a .50 fires out of battery?

This photo, from Armslist, appears to show the mishap firearm.

This photo, from Armslist, appears to show the mishap firearm. Click for full-size.

The various .50 caliber rifle and machine gun cartridges are not trifles. One 18B of our acquaintance earned the nickname Nine Fingers in a moment’s carelessness with a loose round. (He’s not the only one. Here’s a gruesome weapons safety-of-use message from a couple of years later – via ENDO). You might expect that from a round that has 200 to nearly 300 grains of powder. With the .50 everything happens in greater volume and under greater pressure, which makes the quality of gun very, very important.

 

Mishap gun after the accident.

Mishap gun after the accident. Arrows show witness marks where the fast-moving bolt (r.) contacted the receiver and stock.

We’re about to see what happens when a .50 is not well engineered or constructed, and we’ll also cover ammunition as a possible contributing factor.

In recent years there has been a flowering of new .50 designs… 30 years ago it was Barrett or lump it. (That isn’t necessarily bad. The Barrett is a safe, sturdy, and reliable weapon). Now there are many kinds of .50s on the market. Along with the semis, there are bolt action mag-fed guns and a variety of single shots with nearly as many action designs as there are manufacturers. Some of the singles use a Mauser-like bolt with extractor and ejector, but others use a “shell holder” bolt, where a machined slot in the bolt holds the cartridge rim in place before, during and after firing, dispensing with the cost and complexity of an extractor or ejector. The price of this simplicity comes in the complexity of, and time to execute, the normal manual of arms. In a throwback to 1870s breechloader convenience, you remove the bolt from the weapon, slide any spent cartridge out of the shell holder, slide the cartridge into the shell holder in the bolt, and then ram the bolt/cartridge assembly home, turn it to lock, and fire.

That’s an inelegant design, but it’s perfectly safe, if the designers and manufacturers do their job of engineering, substantiation, and manufacture — and if users use good ammo.

Good ammo is hard to come by for .50s. Surplus blasting ammo is reliable and safe but generally falls short of the guns’ accuracy potential. It’s built for machine guns and meant to be fired at planes, vehicles, or groups of troops in a “to whom it may concern” manner.  Match ammo, on the other hand, is usually reloaded, either by end users or small shops or companies. So one risk you take is with reloads, which even in a factory production setting do not get the statistical quality control that, say, ATK applies to their military contract rounds.

And then there’s the quality of gun. This gun is a Vulcan. Vulcan was formerly known as Hesse. Hesse made a series of very low-quality receivers for guns built on surplus parts kits — everything from FALs to ARs to 1919A4s. And every one of these was prone to failures, and the firm’s customer service — under whatever name — was dreadful. So then, Hesse (and later, Vulcan) got into .50 BMG rifles. Their guns sell for a low price point. Unfortunately, that encourages people who can’t operate Google or Bing to buy them. With the results you see here, and some results you don’t.

The Vulcan, also, has a chamber that, while it varies from gun to gun, is tighter than the military specification for machine-gun chambers. What this means is not all surplus ammo will chamber; max-milspec-length rounds may fail to chamber, like a no-go gage.

Vulcan and Hesse bolts, oldest to newest. Source: Outlaw Performance .50 Vulcan page.

Vulcan and Hesse bolts, oldest to newest. Source: Outlaw Performance .50 Vulcan page. (Click for +)

The bolt in this particular gun is at least the fourth design of the the Vulcan/Hesse .50 bolt. The first one had two lugs, oriented at 90 and 270 to the side you slide the cartridge in the shell holder. The second had the same 2-lug bolt head and an improved rear area. The third, which was in early Vulcans, used an interrupted thread, but the fine thread doesn’t seem to have been sufficient for safety. The fourth and current bolt head has three lugs much like the ones from the early Hesse bolt, but arranged equidistant from one another (120 apart) around the bolt head. Vulcan says the bolt is machined from 4140 rod stock, but the surface finish of one we examined looked like a casting.

But the bolt itself didn’t let go. What appears to have happened in the latest case is that the gun fired out of battery. The firing pin free-floats in the bolt, and when the shooter rammed the bolt home, the pin’s own inertia was enough to fire the cartridge in the chamber, before the luckless shooter could turn the bolt and lock it. We haven’t seen even a picture of the inside of the mishap gun’s chamber, but we’ve seen other Hesses/Vulcans, and there’s a lot of tool marks and roughness in there.

In the current accident, the bolt firing out of battery exposed another limitation of the Hesse/Vulcan design (and all shell holders that we know of, really): there’s no secondary bolt retention. If the gun fires out of battery, the bolt is coming back with half the energy that propels the .50′s usual ~700-grain widow makers, and that’s exactly what happened here. The bolt struck and seriously injured the shooter. The blast, flash and burn from the uncontained powder and fragmented cartridge case also injured him; he was left blind and missing several fingers, although his blindness seems to be easing and they are cautiously optimistic he will recover his sight. Several fingers from his left hand were a different matter, as they couldn’t be found. (It is possible, but not known for a fact, that he was resting his left hand on top of the Vulcan’s stock, and the fast-moving bolt tore his fingers off on its way to breaking his shoulder).

Why did the gun fire out of battery in the first place? What none of the four bolt designs did include was one simple, five-cent component that would have prevented this accident: a firing-pin return spring. This spring is especially important if you’re going to fire ammunition that’s loaded with more-sensitive commercial primers than if you only plan to shoot surplus ammunition. Without one, it’s possible for the firing pin to jam in the forward position, like the fixed firing pin on an open-bolt submachine gun. Well, open-bolt subguns can be set up like that, because (1) they’re chambered for low-powered pistol cartridges, and (2) many of them are designed to use advanced primer ignition, where the gun fires as the bolt is closing. Again, no harm done in a gun that’s designed to be “locked” by the weight and inertia of the bolt. In a gun that absolutely, positively must be locked to fire, it’s a mortal error.

As veterans of Special Forces, still involved with the community today, we can assure you that this promotional claim is a great calumny. We never would use this garbage.

As veterans of Special Forces, still involved with the community today, we can assure you that this promotional claim is a great calumny. We never would use this garbage.

In the mishap Vulcan, the base of the .50 casing remains in the shell holder of the bolt. The rest of the casing became shrapnel, and the bolt itself became a deadly projectile. This man is extremely lucky to be alive, and he’s luckier yet if he recovers his vision.

Yes, a Barrett is four times or more what one of these things goes for, and even other single-shots like the McMillan cost much more money. What are your eyes worth? Your life? This guy very nearly answered that question, inadvertently.

Other Vulcan/Hesse .50s have blown up before, apparently. So have other makes of .50, but none of the top-name guns, as far as we know. This one at ENDO also looks like an out of battery fire, and seriously injured its shooter. It’s interesting because it was an AR-style single-shot bolt gun, that was not a shell holder design. On the other hand, it was made by an outfit we haven’t otherwise heard of, called “BOHICA Arms.” (BOHICA is an ancient military acronym for “bend over, here it comes again.” Not exactly a confidence-building company name. But hey, they’re not Vulcan/Hesse/Blackthorne).

Links

ARFCOM thread (as usual, a thin layer of genius floating on a lake of retardation).

Vulcan Armaments. The same Bubba the Gunsmiths that comprise Vulcan also appear to have operated as Hesse, Blackthorne, Frozen North, and probably other names. Name changes for the same reason that Chevy’s small shitbox car has a new name every few years: the public gets wise. Vulcan claims to be a supplier of guns to Special Forces. It is not. And you have to love their warranty policy: KMAGYOYO. (“Based on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty act, Vulcan Group Inc. offers no warranty on its product line.”)

Armslist ad with this rifle for sale in 2010.

It’s official: Army Individual Carbine competition canc’d

The FNAC was one of the candidates most divergent from the M4 design.

The FNAC was one of the candidates most divergent from the M4 design. IMAG: FNH USA

That’s not exactly what they’re saying. They’re saying that all the contestants failed. And (as we reported previously in this space) none of them were enough better than the M4A1 to justify the expense of replacing them. That’s exactly why SOF canc’d the SCAR-L contract years ago. An updated SCAR, the FNAC, was a bridesmaid again as one of the contestants. The others were  the ADCOR Defense BEAR Elite (a piston M4 with forward charging handle), the Advanced Colt Carbine — Monolithic (ACC-M) (an M4 with ambi controls and a monolithic upper/rail unit), the HK 416 (a piston M4) and the Remington (formerly Bushmaster) ACR (a non-M4). The press release goes on to confirm:

The ADCOR BEAR moved the charging handle to the "MP5 position".

The ADCOR BEAR moved the charging handle to the “MP5 position”.

In lieu of a new competition for an IC, the Army will continue fielding and equipping Soldiers with the M4A1 carbine, which consistently performs well and has received high marks from Soldiers. Given limited fiscal resources, the Army’s decision would free IC funding to address other high priority Army needs. This decision is also consistent with recent testimony by the Department of Defense Inspector General (DODIG) before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which questioned the value of an IC competition in light of existing upgrades to the M4 carbine.

Colt's ACC-M resembles current production Colts with its monolithic railed upper.

Colt’s ACC-M resembles current production Colts with its monolithic railed upper.

Shorter version: the gun we have is OK, and we’re out of money for anything that’s just more of the same. In fact, the plan had been to use this concluded Phase II test to select from one to three of the contenders for Phase III troop tests. As it happened, none of the wannabe ACs passed the reliability test:

At the conclusion of Phase II testing, however, no competitor demonstrated a significant improvement in weapon reliability — measured by mean rounds fired between weapon stoppage. Consistent with the program’s search for superior capability, the test for weapon reliability was exceptionally rigorous and exceeded performance experienced in a typical operational environment.

The HK 416, like the SCAR, has seen combat with SF and other SOF. It's an OK but heavy piston AR.

The HK 416, like the SCAR, has seen combat with SF and other SOF. It’s an OK but heavy piston AR.

In other words, we tortured these guns until they screamed for mercy. The test might have been something other than a level playing field, though: while the M4A1′s baseline reliability stats were achieved with M855 ammunition, the Individual Carbine competitors had to test with the new M855A1 Enhanced Performance Round, which may have compromised their reliability somewhat.

The ACR, like the FNAC, kept the ergonomics, bolt, and magazine, and that's about it.

The ACR, like the FNAC, kept the ergonomics, bolt, and magazine, and that’s about it.

What this means for the competitors: game over, man. Absent the cachet of military adoption, and the economies of scale of military production, it’s unlikely that the ACR, ACC or BEAR will be produced for the civilian market, although the makers may still target overseas military buyers. The SCAR-L of course remains in production.

Expect the Army now to experiment with really far-out stuff, science-fiction weaponry that’s decades from IOC if it’s ever going to be practical at all. Because going to a near-COTS competition for a slight improvement didn’t do it.

 

What? ‘Domestic Surveillance Directorate’?

eagle_circle_bigIf we’ve gotten one, we’ve gotten thirty messages about this website, which purports to be the home of the NSA’s Domestic Surveillance Directorate.

It isn’t. It’s a parody. It’s a very good parody with many pages, graphics which closely ape those beloved of today’s TLAs (TLA = Three Letter Agency), and arguments that closely track those of NSA’s defenders. For example:

Your Data: If You Have Nothing to Hide, You Have Nothing to Fear
Our value is founded on a unique and deep understanding of risks, vulnerabilities, mitigations, and threats. Domestic Surveillance plays a vital role in our national security by maintaining a total information awareness of all domestic activities by using advanced data mining systems to “connect the dots” to identify suspicious patterns.

For security reasons, it is unrealistic to expect a complete list of information we collect for our national citizen database. In the spirit of openness and transparency however, here is a partial list:

  • internet searches
  • websites visited
  • emails sent and received
  • social media activity (Facebook, Twitter, etc)
  • blogging activity including posts read, written, and commented on - View our patent
  • videos watched and/or uploaded online
  • photos viewed and/or uploaded online
  • music downloads
  • mobile phone GPS-location data
  • mobile phone apps downloaded
  • phone call records - View our patent
  • text messages sent and received
  • online purchases and auction transactions
  • bookstore receipts
  • credit card/ debit card transactions
  • bank statements
  • cable television shows watched and recorded
  • commuter toll records
  • parking receipts
  • electronic bus and subway passes / Smartpasses
  • travel itineraries
  • border crossings
  • surveillance cameras
  • medical information including diagnoses and treatments
  • prescription drug purchases
  • guns and ammunition sales
  • educational records
  • arrest records
  • driver license information

The first bit — the “if you’ve got nothing to hide” statement — sounds like it came right out of the Stasi wet dreams of government-power absolutists like Stewart Baker or Alberto Gonzales. The second bit — the laundry list of data collected — sounds like it came out of the hemp nightmares of Occupy Ron Paul. But neither bit originates at NSA: the URL is in a .info domain, not .gov or .mil. That should be a red flag for you.

Another clue is the about page, which includes a picture of the putative DSD director, “General Janet Alexander,” a picture created by morphing Gen. Keith Alexander’s picture with Janet Napolitano’s. We’ll link it for you Doubting Thomases, but we advise you to click that link with caution. You cannot unsee that picture, once burned into your defenseless retinas.

In a footer at the bottom of every page — apparently missed by everyone who’s emailing us about this site — the author clearly states it’s a parody. On a nested about page, he explains that quite clearly, and provides links to a couple other websites maintained by the same fellow exposing him as a bit of a government groupie (one of the sites, for instance, is a Camp David fan site). The domain registration of the site is private.

But the real NSA knows who it is! (Rim-shot).

Since the “DSD website” seems bereft of any actual government information, here is some actual government information for you — a declassified history of the foundation of the NSA, written about forty years ago. Reading this, you can see that even NSA’s forerunner agencies collected “diplomatic and commercial traffic.” The Navy explained that they did this, not to read the traffic so much as to maintain cryptological proficiency between wars that provided military cryptological targets. And it is not always explicitly stated, but it seems clear that the “diplomatic and commercial traffic” targeted was foreign traffic.

early_history_nsa.pdf

Enjoy if you dare. Big Brother is watching you — and not watching the Brothers Tsarnayev.

Where’s the Ricin apologies?

Castor beans. You can actually swallow them like this... it's the stuff inside that'll kill ya.

Castor beans. You can actually swallow them like this… it’s the stuff inside that’ll kill ya.

So what did the media say about the ricin-letter “assault” on various anti-gun figures, which (as we reported previously) turned out to be an attempt to frame a guy?

  • Piers Morgan of CNN (the guy who left England with an illegal wiretapping rap hanging over his head) blames — who else? The NRA. (video link).

Piers Morgan and CNN have not apologized or corrected their report as of this date.

The New York Daily News blamed… the NRA: “paranoia — fomented by the National Rifle Association and like-minded politicians….”

When the ricin mailer turned out not to be the NRA, the Daily News apologized… oh, wait. They never apologized. That’s why this graf doesn’t have a link.

  • The prestigious, ponderous and portentous The Atlantic blamed… wait for it… the NRA: “The threat reported late Wednesday afternoon is the most high profile — and probably least representative — example of the furious, successful national pushback against new gun legislation, spearheaded by the National Rifle Association…. The mayor has been a target of the NRA for months….”

The Atlantic and their writer Philip Bump are surely going to apologize for that one of these days. But they haven’t on any of the days between 30 May, when he wrote that and his editors signed off on it, and today.

  • The Washington Post, in an AP-sourced puff piece about Bloomberg, coyly placed the blame on… the NRA: “the National Rifle Association has made clear it sees Bloomberg as a leading foe, caricaturing him as an octopus on the cover of its magazine in 2007 and branding him an ‘evangelist for the nanny state.’

The Washington Post and the AP have neither apologized for the inference nor corrected it. Update: the Post did 1984 the article.

  • The Idaho State Journal edited that same AP feed to more explicitly lay the blame at the feet of… the NRA: “The National Rifle Association has made it clear it sees Bloomberg as a leading foe, caricaturing him as an octopus on the cover of its magazine in 2007 and branding him an ‘evangelist for the nanny state.’”

When it turned out not to be the NRA… yep, you guessed it, the Idaho State Journal didn’t say a word.

If you’re waiting for WPIX and its commentator Larry Mendte to apologize, it’s going to be a long wait. It’s already been nearly two weeks since they illustrated why they’re writing news and not gags, and not a peep out of ‘em.

  • On MSNBC, host Lawrence O’Donnell, E.J. Dionne of the Washington Post, and someone named Joy Reid, all agreed that the problem was… the NRA. Reid had the money quote, that this was “asymmetrical warfare out of the National Rifle Association,” but they all blamed the NRA for this crime.

When it turned out not to be the NRA… when the phone didn’t wring it was Larry, EJ, and Joy not calling to apologize, and MSNBC and the Post never apologized either.

  • In something called the Memphis Flyer, they blame… you got it, the NRA. “The NRA has morphed from an organization that taught firearm safety and responsible gun ownership into a lobbying group for the armaments industry.” While they’re at it, they also blame Fox News, and manage to still blame Nathan Richardson.

You know these guys are not going to apologize. They are the kind of media figures that believes you can use an lie to advance a “deeper truth.”

But not everybody owes an apology. To our surprise, when we reviewed Bloomberg’s statements, he was considerably more cautious than his media supporters. He never overtly fingers his political opponents for the ricin letters.

Collecting “The American Gun” Part 1: Intro

American-GunChris Kyle’s book The American Gun, reviewed here, purports to tell the history of the US in ten guns. The thought crossed our mind: what would it take to make an entry-level collection of them? 

  1. The Kentucky long rifle (18th C.)
  2. The Spencer repeating rifle (1858)
  3. The Colt Single Action Army (1873)
  4. The Winchester 1873
  5. The Springfield M1903
  6. The Colt Model 1911
  7. The Thompson Submachine Gun (1919)
  8. The M1 Rifle (1936)
  9. The .38 Special police revolver (1920s)
  10. The M16 Rifle (1963)

We set the following parameters: representative examples. For auto weapons, semi equivalents. For very expensive weapons, replicas and restorations. We looked only in GunBroker. Over the next 10 days, gun by gun, we’ll show you what we found — and then wrap it all up.